|
|
|
Law
|
| Next Page » |
Pages: [1] 2 |
| 1. Brockton MA Court Rules in Favor of Transgender Student (2000)
|
| Positive: A Massachusetts Superior Court ruled that a middle school may not prohibit a transgender student from expressing her gender identity even if that expression does not conform with the sex ascribed to her at birth. |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [131]_ Added: May 24, 2006 |
 |
| 3. Desperately Seeking Arlette (and the Precedent She Set)
|
| a court actually recognized a legal change of gender for a post-op transsexual as early as 1945 and that the court specifically rejected an effort to prohibit that transsexual from marrying as a member of her post-transition gender?
|
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [151]_ Added: May 24, 2006 |
 |
| 4. Goodridge v. Department of Public Health [MA]
|
| A dissusion of how the Massachusetts high court ended government discrimination against same-sex couples in marriage |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [103]_ Added: Jun 4, 2006 |
 |
| 6. Littleton v. Prange (1999)
|
| Negative: Texas appellate court negates 7-year marriage of Christie Lee Littleton because she was born male-bodied. Site also contains documents related to the litigation. |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [127]_ Added: May 24, 2006 |
 |
| 7. Louisiana and the FGTRA of 1949
|
| THE PROOF IS IN THE HISTORY: THE LOUISIANA CONSTITUTION RECOGNISES TRANSSEXUAL MARRIAGES AND LOUISIANA SEX DISCRIMINATION LAW COVERS TRANSSEXUALS – SO WHY ISN’T EVERYBODY CELEBRATING? |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [126]_ Added: May 20, 2006 |
 |
| 9. Rosa v. Park West Bank (1st Cir., 2000)
|
| Positive: a federal Court of Appeals found that federal sex discrimination laws applies to an individual who was discriminated against for cross-dressing, and suggested that Ulane is no longer good law. |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [126]_ Added: May 24, 2006 |
 |
| 10. Schwenk v. Hartford (9th Cir., 2000)
|
| Positive: a federal Court of Appeals found that discrimination "because one fails to act in the way expected of a man or woman" may violate federal sex discrimination laws. |
| Rating: [0.00]_ Votes:
[0]_ Hits: [124]_ Added: May 24, 2006 |
 |
|
| Next Page » |
Pages: [1] 2 |
|
|