They sure would NOT have been the ones that worked at the Chinese Emperors Court… and there where MANY.
Not a single male was allowed in the forbidden city without being castrated (only the emperor) – those eunuchs’ penis WAS removed to prevent intercourse (with the empires…).
Correct, as the ancient Chinese removed the whole package including penis-shaft aswell and not only the testicles. Basically the Chinese did a full Penectomy in Hijra-style, so for very logical reasons, they would not have been very suitable for intercourse, no.
However, Eunuchs in ancient Greece and specifically, The Roman Empire, were castrated by only removing the testes, and hence very favored by females, as the penis itself usually remained fully functional, which allowed them to have full intercourse but without risk of impregnate the female.
Or, as the one duscussion from those times goes about a female engaging in those activities; "Do you ask, Panychus, why your Caelia only consorts with eunuchs? Caelia wants the flowers of marriage – not the fruit." Annah:
Good luck with that. No reputable SRS surgeon will even think about placing a penis, a vagina and a rectum all within five inches of each other. No one.
Put me to the test and prove me wrong. Find a surgeon who is licensed (in any country) who will do it and I will admit I am wrong. Getting a response from a doctor who will pay to put a human ear on a cat doesn't count. The doctor has to be licensed in her or his country and under a somewhat good reputation (i.e, a back alley "Doctor" doesn't count).
So prove me wrong and find a doctor who will do this; because as it stands, I am under the firm belief that no sane doctor would even entertain the idea. Not because of having both a penis and a vagina...but because it is not physiologically viable.
So prove me wrong. Not from your words but from a doctor's.
Thanks for the luckwishes.
However I am not the one to have this surgery, but, thank you anyways for wishing me the best.
However unfortunately, your further text in your post contains a selfcontradiction; Firstly, you state with a matteroffact-tone that no reputable doctor will perform the surgery- then you end the post by saying that you hold the firm belief
that no-one will- Hence revealing that you basically don't know at all but only states you personal opinion that no-one would do it and that the surgery is "impossible", as that is what you want to think.
In short, you are holding on to the the firm belief that no one would do it, therefore you have already made you standpointout of opinions.
Not to be rude, but, that being said, I have no interest nor obligations in providing proof, as the naysayers are not the persons that this procedure concerns, but, the creator of this thread.
Hence, I have basically only obligations to him, not to people that wants to argue about the topic because it upsets their values too much.
And advicing him to ask as many surgeons Worldwide as he can, will not do any harm whatsoever, even if it would result in him getting the cold hand by each and everyone of them.