House Committee Set to Consider Anti-LGBT Bill Allowing Taxpayer-Funded Discrimination

U.S. Congress

The Seal of the U.S. Congress

Washington, DC – A sweeping piece of discriminatory legislation that would allow businesses and government contractors to deny services to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people is set for a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives next month. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) will hold a hearing on the deceptively titled First Amendment Defense Act (FADA) on July 12.

FADA (S. 1598/H.B. 2802) was originally introduced in Congress last year and has not moved to date. The hearing in the House, however, comes at the close of a state legislative season which saw more than 200 bills singling out LGBT Americans for discrimination. Last month, House lawmakers passed a vaguely written measure that would likely upend President Obama’s executive order extending LGBT nondiscrimination protections to employees of federal contractors. That measure, attached to a defense appropriations bill, must be addressed in an upcoming conference committee with Senate lawmakers.

“It’s stunning that some lawmakers in Congress continue to prioritize legislation that promotes discrimination against the LGBT community,” said Matt McTighe, Freedom for All Americans executive director. “This out-of-touch legislation does nothing to strengthen the existing protections for religious freedom – all this bill does is make it even easier to discriminate against LGBT people. Americans overwhelmingly support treating LGBT people fairly and equally under the law, and this bill intentionally undermines that very value.”

Here are just a few examples of how FADA would allow for taxpayer-funded discrimination:

  • Much of President Obama’s amended Executive Order 11246, which protects LGBT employees of federal contractors from job discrimination, would be left unenforceable. The Williams Institute estimates the executive order protects an additional 16.5 million employees.
  • A government contractor could fire an employee with a strong performance record after executives learn that employee recently married his partner of the same sex.
  • A school that receives federal funding could fire a teacher it suspects of having a premarital sexual relationship with her longtime boyfriend.
  • A federal government employee could refuse to process a claim, benefit or service to which a married same-sex couple is entitled under federal law, and to which the United States Supreme Court has held the couple is fully entitled under the Constitution.

Visit for more information on the First Amendment Defense Act.

About Freedom for All Americans

Freedom for All Americans LogoFreedom for All Americans is the bipartisan campaign to secure full nondiscrimination protections for LGBT people nationwide. Our work brings together Republicans and Democrats, businesses large and small, people of faith, and allies from all walks of life to make the case for comprehensive nondiscrimination protections that ensure everyone is treated fairly and equally.


About Author


  1. Yeah, more crap from out of touch lawmakers. Another waste of tax dollars that will receive push-back from every major corporation in the country. When will these fools come to terms with the 21st century?

  2. *
    It is election year, dog whistle politics meant only to stir their minions into a froth. It wastes time and public taxpayer money that funds the cost operating the House chambers while they ‘debate’ their folly. Such legislation has no chance with President Obama let alone the Democrats in the Senate.

    Yet they persist against the will of the clear majority of Americans.


Leave A Reply