it is one of the better "tests", IE I was expecting worse.
it is clear (my score = 360) that if you can do 'maths' or spatial reasoning
this casts some doubt as to 'classic TS" (is that like the old 'primary vs secondary' classification?)
[oh, please, put me in a box!] -
which is absurd.
and sexist. erm genderist.
Quote from: Melissa on June 14, 2006, 08:54:01 AM
I don't remember the question, but I'm strong in both areas. Sometimes it is dependant how the question is asked, rather than the actual answer.
Melissa
the one with the rotating red/blue cubes on a stick, I think she means
asked in such a 'roundabout' way I almost gave up on it myself
all that said, I do think that a lot of it is somewhat well-designed, in that the perception of INTUITIVENESS may be a key indicator of inherent gender.
it's the
real girls can't do maths implication that is absurd.
also the 'if ten would you prefer to go play with your pet or fantasize (instead of GIRLS JUST WANNA HAVE FUN)?' type-angle seems suspect to me