Author Topic: Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock  (Read 5669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maxman

  • FTM
  • Friend
  • ****
  • Posts: 198
  • Reputation: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • Prosthetic Review Blog
Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock
« on: October 21, 2015, 06:11:20 pm »
Hi everyone! Sorry for those who have been waiting for my head-to-head review, life got busy but I've finally got it up. It's a chart that compares 4 of the big-name brands of STP prosthetics on the market today. I was lucky enough to get my hands on all 4 and directly test them in comparison to one another, and document it in detail. Some of the comparison topics are: Look, Feel, Packing, Playing, Ease of STP Use, Sexual Feel for Partner, Sexual Pleasure for Self, etc.

Products being compared are:
  • Emisil STP
  • Reelmagik STP
  • Peecock 5.5"
  • Freetom Sleek with Paint Plus

I am not good at forums and couldn't format the review chart to fit on here in full, so please see my blog (link in signature) for the entire thing, but I will give my final findings in this post to summarize for those without time to read the whole review!

Recommendations:

Buy Emisil if...
STP is important, Realistic looks outweigh  importance of realistic play/pleasure, but you may use it for play once and a while.

Buy Reelmagik if...
Looks are the absolute most important, you are willing to fiddle with adhesive and STP that may be difficult. And play/pleasure aren’t required.

Buy Peecock if...
You’re willing to take a risk on a company and product that have proved themselves unreliable on multiple occasions.

Buy Freetom if...
A product that does all features efficiently (packing, peeing, playing, and pleasure) is important to you.

Everyone is different and our needs/preferences are different. My reviews are truthful and honest, they do not hide  or neglect to mention anything about a product, I put it out in the open whether things are positive or negative. All products are described to the fullest extent of my experiences, but only reflect my own personal experiences. I cannot speak for others and things may work for me and not you, or may be bad for me and good for you. I only aim to help however I can for those looking to read about how a product works.

If you have any questions, please let me know, I'd be happy to elaborate or help however I can.
2.5 Years Post Keyhole (Top Surgery), 2 Years 9 Months on T
Product Tester for Emisil, ReelMagik, Peecock, Freetom, FTM Pit Stop.
Packers reviewed: Jimmy STP, Peecock gen 2, TSW python, TSW diamondback, eroticreations new and old, emisil pack and play, emisil STP, ReelMagik STP, Freetom Sleek, Peecock Gen 3S.

Reviews Can Be Found At: lifeftm.tumblr.com

Offline Nathan90

  • ****
  • Posts: 318
  • Reputation: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2015, 02:23:22 am »
I need to add that Freetom has been unreliable in the past as well. As a company mostly. Ignoring complaints or bad reviews, waving them off. I don't have one myself but know of multiple guys who had trouble getting a new packer that wasn't faulty or getting their money back.
Instead of waiting for the storm to pass, learn to dance in the rain

Offline maxman

  • FTM
  • Friend
  • ****
  • Posts: 198
  • Reputation: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • Prosthetic Review Blog
Re: Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2015, 08:45:03 am »
I need to add that Freetom has been unreliable in the past as well. As a company mostly. Ignoring complaints or bad reviews, waving them off. I don't have one myself but know of multiple guys who had trouble getting a new packer that wasn't faulty or getting their money back.
Thanks for sharing, that's good to note. It wasn't my experience but it's good for people to know it has happened.
2.5 Years Post Keyhole (Top Surgery), 2 Years 9 Months on T
Product Tester for Emisil, ReelMagik, Peecock, Freetom, FTM Pit Stop.
Packers reviewed: Jimmy STP, Peecock gen 2, TSW python, TSW diamondback, eroticreations new and old, emisil pack and play, emisil STP, ReelMagik STP, Freetom Sleek, Peecock Gen 3S.

Reviews Can Be Found At: lifeftm.tumblr.com

Offline Toysfortransmen

  • Newbie
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2015, 08:12:11 am »
I personally would rather go with peecock than freetom any day. Not only does theyre customer service suck beyond suck, but anything other than the sleek or rogue are impossible to use for any of the functions. And even then, theyre funnel is far too big to comfortably do anything with. While they have good appearances and a select few people have been able to use them (and if they can use them their great!) but theres tons and tons of guys who are just selling them cause they cant make it work.

I will admit that peecocks silicone is cheap and has the possibility of ripping easily, especially on their newer models. But their function beats freetom in pretty much all areas.

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • Posts: 2,218
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Emisil vs Reelmagik vs Freetom vs Peecock
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2015, 10:02:38 pm »
maxman,

Thanks for this review.  I looked at the one on your blog and it was extensive and done very well.  I hope people in the community check it out.  You clearly put a lot of time into it.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)