As for the power dynamic of men's clothing, my personal experience hasn't shown a correlation to suits and power or wealth. I realize the contradiction between this and how I started the post.
That has me thinking...
I think the dynamic between suits and power/wealth dates back 100 years or so where those in the professional services or business would differentiate themselves from the blue collar workers by wearing bespoke suits. For most, the cost of acquiring a suit was out of reach, even if they wanted to create the illusion of being more wealthy.
In today's society, wealthy men like Mark Zuckerberg or hedge funds managers are eschewing wearing suits in favour of jeans and t-shirts, almost to say "I'm so wealthy, that I don't have to conform to the ideal of being seen in a suit". Plus the fact that suits are now so affordable that anyone can buy one, so it is no longer a indicator of power and wealth.
So I'm not sure if this is a generational shift or if it relates back to Amanda's original post as to why we, in male mode, dress casually yet aspire to wear the glamorous feminine clothes of women we find attractive. Also, if we want to attract those sort of women as a potential partner in our lives, why aren't why dressing in such a way that they would find attractive??
My thoughts are that perhaps we are mistaking our attraction as sexual when in fact we don't want to be with them, we simply want to be them....and so we are less concerned as to how we appear in male mode but are very particular in how we appear in female mode.