Thank you for replying Rakel.
As you say, bio-identicals are thought to be very safe, and if I understood you right Premarin is almost as safe.
My concern is that when I go to my GP surgery, the immediate response from both of the doctors I have seen so far is to warn me of the dangers because of increased DVT risks even though I had no history and it appears to be on no studies that I know of apart from studies in the 1990's. When I asked one about it the she replied that I probably knew more about it than she did, and the other doctor denied any knowledge.
If they were not giving advice against hormones, that would be understandable, but it appears they are still giving 1995 advice, today.
From the Guardian:
"A health scare in the UK in 1995 over thrombosis caused a drop in usage, and an increase in pregnancies and abortions. However, in 2000, a report in the British Medical Journal said the scare was unfounded.
On the positive side, the pill has been shown to protect against cancer of the ovaries and the womb lining, and against pelvic inflammatory disease, a major cause of infertility in women.
It can make periods more regular, but is not recommended for women over 35 who smoke heavily, the obese, or those with high blood pressure, a history of heart disease, blood clots or other specific illnesses such as breast cancer."
And that's without mentioning Osteoperosis
My own wife went through the menopause in the 1990's and started on hormones but stopped and still refuses to take them, because they are still giving the same advice.