Author Topic: Mini-review EZP STP  (Read 15708 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Brett's EZP Review
« Reply #40 on: March 24, 2015, 08:37:02 pm »
Hi, guys!

So, I didn't want to write a review prior to getting some proper briefs with a fly so that peeing while dressed could be part of my review.

I had ordered the Bond horizontal fly trunk underwear that Alex had in his youtube video, but haven't received that yet.  I decided to go ahead and order some all cotton briefs because I was tired of having to drop my drawers all the way down to pee (the EZP is too short to go over the top of your underwear)  I received these in the mail today, so I was able to put the STP to the "through the fly", test.  http://www.calvinklein.com/shop/en/ck/underwear/mens-briefs/62064183

Let me tell you guys.  I have a TON of STPs in my drawers.  None of them have come close to this one.

The bottom line is that this thing is exactly what I have been looking for. 

I have tried to write out an organized review, but it just doesn't seem to be coming together (too tired).  So, I am going to just throw out thoughts in no real order.

Random thoughts I think people might find useful (otherwise known as why I love this STP/packer).

1) The outside of it looks exactly like a Mr. Limpy xs.  It is a replica, vein for vein.  The only difference is that the entire thing is girthier.  Think of it as Mr. Limpy with inflammation.  Mr. Limpy is my favorite packer, so you can imagine how happy this makes me.
2) You really REALLY don't need a harness/jockstrap.  I know there are guys that will bop around with their packers moving all over the place, but I can't even tolerate a Mr. Limpy moving in briefs.  This sucker just stays there.
3) It is very light.  Lighter than Mr. Limpy, which is a bummer because I like the feeling Mr. Limpy's weight (but nothing heavier), but if it wasn't this light, then it would need a jockstrap.  No jockstrap wins over feeling the "weight" of a penis, for me, though.
4) I love the color (I have the original, lightest color, which isn't that light).  I am pale caucasian and it works fine for me.  If I were a little darker, it would work fine, too.  I don't know how to explain it, but it has a hue to it that I think may transverse different caucasian ethnicities.
5) I can pee through my underwear fly (not including the fly of the pants).  The shaft isn't long, but it is long enough.
6) I would strongly suggest you get form fitting briefs like Alex wears in his videos.  The all cotton Calvin Klein I listed above are working to hold the STP against my body, but it would be even better if I had underwear that had a touch of spandex in it (the Bond underwear Alex wears has 5% elastane).
*7)  This one needs a star by it.  I don't know about you, but every packer/stp I have worn rides up while I am sitting down.  I have to push it down/fix it after I stand up.  NOT THIS ONE.  It stays in place.  Crazy awesome.
8. The material is quality silicone and I am hopeful it will last a long time.  It is soft and comfortable against my body.  I would say you need to be careful with it and take care of it, though.  The center of the bottom is pretty thin.  I personally wouldn't be balling it up and putting it into my pocket.
9) I don't have the wetness issue jay and I believe someone else might have mentioned.  I just make sure all the pee is out of it and then move on.  I don't feel like I have pee left on my body, I guess I just do a little wipe with the back of it.  The thing is though, with any STP there is going to be pee left on our urethra and very small drops of urine that stays on the STP.  It is just logical.  I like that the inside is smooth and shiny, which I think helps all the pee slide out.
10) I haven't had any problems peeing since I got this thing.  One time I started to pee and wasn't lined up right, but as soon as I got it under me correctly, it was fine.  In order to be successful, it works like other STPs.  You can't have the back of it flush with your body.  You need to have that little space so that it rolls down.  I know the shaft is at a 45 degree angle so gravity should take care of all of it, but I find I still need to tilt it like other STPs.
11) I am packing it up and to the left at a 45 degree angle Alex suggested.  It is the shaft that will clue people in to you have something in your pants.  The balls are too small/half sized to create a bulge of any sort.

12)  I don't see how one could really wear the packer with the shaft folding over the balls.  It does not make a realistic bulge (to me).  This is honestly the only thing about the packer that I can find fault with.  I miss the shaft over the balls and the weight of Mr. Limpy.
13) It cost me something like $250 after taxes and shipping.

Bottom line:

If having a Mr. Limpy XS in your pants with no harness that you can use as a STP does not make you giggle with glee, then this may not be for you.  It is perfect for me because this is exactly what I have been looking for.

If you want something to help you be seen as male that is also functional, this is a good choice.  If part of wearing a packing STP is about the "experience" of feeling something hanging between your legs, this is not for you.  This STP is for the conservative man, not the flashy one.

For me, it is for sure a 10 out of 10





Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #41 on: March 25, 2015, 01:02:38 am »
That's a good review! :)
I think it's more realistic than Mr. Limpy, but that's me. It does have somewhat the appearance of the 3.5". I agree re: the harness/jockstrap, just isn't needed at all. Had enough time to really test this. Also worn to martial arts classes, though wearing compression shorts. It stays put for vigorous activities with a nice normal type bulge, nothing silly. I agree re: balling it up and so on. It looks sturdy but not too sturdy. I think it is nicely made. I think the wetness problem I have is my own, well strange anatomy. I agree on how to wear it. I agree that Chase's idea re folding the shaft down is very unnatural for the product. Also you can feel the thing thru pants (gotta watch stroking my... haha), but it's something I like. But no you can't feel hanging down, I like that I can feel it there without a jockstrap very much.

I have only had the one accident. I'm a little worried re: using as much, but I think I'll get used to it.

--Jay

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #42 on: March 25, 2015, 06:28:29 am »
That's a good review! :)
I think it's more realistic than Mr. Limpy, but that's me. It does have somewhat the appearance of the 3.5". I agree re: the harness/jockstrap, just isn't needed at all. Had enough time to really test this. Also worn to martial arts classes, though wearing compression shorts. It stays put for vigorous activities with a nice normal type bulge, nothing silly. I agree re: balling it up and so on. It looks sturdy but not too sturdy. I think it is nicely made. I think the wetness problem I have is my own, well strange anatomy. I agree on how to wear it. I agree that Chase's idea re folding the shaft down is very unnatural for the product. Also you can feel the thing thru pants (gotta watch stroking my... haha), but it's something I like. But no you can't feel hanging down, I like that I can feel it there without a jockstrap very much.

I have only had the one accident. I'm a little worried re: using as much, but I think I'll get used to it.

--Jay

Hi, Jay.  Thanks for coming in and giving your two cents for the other guys to see what you agree/disagree with.  I completely agree that it looks much more realistic than limpy.  I think you could get by at a urinal with this thing.  I am just saying it is based on Mr. Limpy's surface  (which is a GREAT thing, in my opinion)  Do you have a xs Mr. Limpy?  Put them next to each other.  The large majority of the pores and bumps and stuff are the same, but on a larger scale.  However, the look of it is much more realistic.  Although it isn't anything like the RM in terms of skin and stuff, I really do think that you could get away with it at a urinal.  This thing is perfect in terms of form and function.

The other thing I noticed was the urinary meatus.  RM has on their page how their meatus is the same as a cis penis and how you don't see this on a lot of STPs.  I would suggest that the EZP's is spot on.  This is based on what I am seeing on the RM page, I haven't spent time with a real life penis.

Thanks again for your two cents. :)
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #43 on: March 25, 2015, 03:00:09 pm »
Yes I do see what you mean re: Mr Limpy.
Urinary meatus, I had to look this up, and yes, looks very realistic. Also has a normal stream, which took me awhile to get, btw.

--Jay

Offline Maleth

  • Traveler
  • ****
  • Posts: 479
  • Reputation: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #44 on: March 26, 2015, 04:02:37 pm »
Here's the review from tumblr:
http://onatransjourney.tumblr.com/post/113989331319/review-of-real-ezp

He just made this blog so it might take a bit of time before he gets around to updating it.

Also, Brett, very helpful review!

~Maleth

Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #45 on: March 26, 2015, 05:34:34 pm »
Excellent review, and I agree with it pretty much 100%.

This is just a great product. Negative is that it is hard to get. Hopefully he is working on ways to amp up his production. I think part of his problem is that this is a little older guy with real world experience and is a responsible adult. It's a nice thing to see, you know if he were a young kid he would immediately have quit his job. Seems like he has held onto his day job. But I think he has a real winner here. His other ideas seem excellent as well (a meta device to help with STP in folks with metas and a dedicated device for sex). Not sure when those will be available but they seem like interesting ideas.

--Jay

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
EZP Update
« Reply #46 on: April 16, 2015, 08:37:56 pm »
Hey, guys.

I thought I should check in after 5 weeks of daily/constant wear.  I continue to be pleased.  Very pleased. 

I wear this packer day and night, without harness, in relatively tight fitting 100% cotton briefs, and continue to be pleased with how it packs and pees. 

The Bond "top loader" underwear was not what I had hoped and the underwear doesn't allow for me to "drop" the STP low enough to get under my anatomy to urinate.

I still believe that if I could find some briefs with fly that has 5% spandex, I would be even more pleased with how it packs.

I wish for two things:

1)The STP shaft was 1/2 inch longer.  Not an inch longer (as that would be too long when packing), but 1/2 inch longer for urinating reasons.  Then it would be perfect.

2) I wish the underside of the STP was a little stronger/less compliant.  I usually have to mold/hold the shaft so that my underwear does not create a bend in the shaft that will result in the urine backflowing/coming out the sides, etc.  I mentioned in my review that it was thin in this area.  I think that if he thickened it a bit, it wouldn't collapse as easily.

Otherwise, I continue to be pleased.  I don't expect myself to purchase any other STP/packer at this point.

I do need to drop the score down to a 9/10 due to the above.

Jay, how have things been for you?
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: EZP Update
« Reply #47 on: April 16, 2015, 11:45:57 pm »
I'd probably give it about the same rating. It works very well except if I REALLY have to go. (I think that's similar to many STPs though.)
I agree with you on the measurement aspect-- I think 1/2 inch more would be great.

I'm very happy with it for packing. i have worn it for martial arts and on my recumbent trike with compression shorts. It stays put absolutely, doesn't move around. This is a very good packer test.

I think the Calvin Klein's briefs work best, but not too bad at all with Fruit of the Loom boxer briefs (covered waist band variety), just giving specifics here as it might be different with different brands/models. Pelican's are disappointing. My sister gave me a couple and they just don't work at all. The shaft isn't coming out of the hole right. Too bad as these are very nice underwear.

I kind of had his rating a little lowered just because they are so hard to buy. Perhaps this will change over time.

--Jay

Hey, guys.

I thought I should check in after 5 weeks of daily/constant wear.  I continue to be pleased.  Very pleased. 

I wear this packer day and night, without harness, in relatively tight fitting 100% cotton briefs, and continue to be pleased with how it packs and pees. 

The Bond "top loader" underwear was not what I had hoped and the underwear doesn't allow for me to "drop" the STP low enough to get under my anatomy to urinate.

I still believe that if I could find some briefs with fly that has 5% spandex, I would be even more pleased with how it packs.

I wish for two things:

1)The STP shaft was 1/2 inch longer.  Not an inch longer (as that would be too long when packing), but 1/2 inch longer for urinating reasons.  Then it would be perfect.

2) I wish the underside of the STP was a little stronger/less compliant.  I usually have to mold/hold the shaft so that my underwear does not create a bend in the shaft that will result in the urine backflowing/coming out the sides, etc.  I mentioned in my review that it was thin in this area.  I think that if he thickened it a bit, it wouldn't collapse as easily.

Otherwise, I continue to be pleased.  I don't expect myself to purchase any other STP/packer at this point.

I do need to drop the score down to a 9/10 due to the above.

Jay, how have things been for you?

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: EZP Update
« Reply #48 on: April 18, 2015, 01:37:59 pm »
I'd probably give it about the same rating. It works very well except if I REALLY have to go. (I think that's similar to many STPs though.)
I agree with you on the measurement aspect-- I think 1/2 inch more would be great.

I'm very happy with it for packing. i have worn it for martial arts and on my recumbent trike with compression shorts. It stays put absolutely, doesn't move around. This is a very good packer test.

I think the Calvin Klein's briefs work best, but not too bad at all with Fruit of the Loom boxer briefs (covered waist band variety), just giving specifics here as it might be different with different brands/models. Pelican's are disappointing. My sister gave me a couple and they just don't work at all. The shaft isn't coming out of the hole right. Too bad as these are very nice underwear.

I kind of had his rating a little lowered just because they are so hard to buy. Perhaps this will change over time.

--Jay

Jay, I know what you mean when you say about really having to go.  Fortunately, I am able to stop my stream part way through, so it can drain out a bit.

In term of the Calvin's do you have the ones I posted?  http://www.calvinklein.com/shop/en/ck/underwear/mens-briefs/62064183  I do still wish there was less material to get through, and I am going to find some briefs that have a touch of spandex in them, but yes, they work for now.

Jay, do you think that other guys read our posts?  I write them in hopes that someday some lad will find them useful.

Looks like they are still out of stock for now.  I know that he capped them off even earlier time wise this time.  I feel for the guy because I know he works his a** off to get them done.  It was his third run, I suppose.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: EZP Update
« Reply #49 on: April 18, 2015, 03:22:36 pm »
There are a thousand plus views. I don't think I personally have had more than 100 (and most likely many fewer). If you give you another 100 and the guys who have posted 10, there are still 800 views. Math is fun. :) (Never thought I'd say that.)

I don't have the low rise, but otherwise yes. I agree 5% spandex would be nice. But cotton is very good for the private parts. They feel VERY soft and comfortable imo. Actually have some FothL covered waist band boxer briefs , I think they work okay. The fly is much bigger. I think the CK are a little hard to get thru the opening, but I don't use the urinal anyway due to not liking to be wet.

I am guessing Alex has a real "day job" so that he is not making these 8 hours a day but makes about 4-5 per week in time after work and weekends. I may be totally off on this one, but my impression.

--Jay




Jay, I know what you mean when you say about really having to go.  Fortunately, I am able to stop my stream part way through, so it can drain out a bit.

In term of the Calvin's do you have the ones I posted?  http://www.calvinklein.com/shop/en/ck/underwear/mens-briefs/62064183  I do still wish there was less material to get through, and I am going to find some briefs that have a touch of spandex in them, but yes, they work for now.

Jay, do you think that other guys read our posts?  I write them in hopes that someday some lad will find them useful.

Looks like they are still out of stock for now.  I know that he capped them off even earlier time wise this time.  I feel for the guy because I know he works his a** off to get them done.  It was his third run, I suppose.

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #50 on: April 19, 2015, 09:01:03 am »
Jay, Alex does have a full time job.

Ok, so I ordered these underwear.  http://www.calvinklein.com/shop/en/ck/underwear/mens-briefs/62102661

I do think my Calvin 100% cotton ones are already becoming a bit saggy in front.  Subsequently, the STP is not staying as tight against my body when not in use.  The more saggy they get, the more likely the STP will start to move around, if I wear baggier pants.  Part of what creates this is sticking my hand in there to wrangle my STP around two pieces of material to pee.  I am constantly stretching the material.

For a long time I wore the Calvin Klein cotton stretch trunks.  For many years, they were my standard underwear.  Since I have used this material (95% cotton 5% elastane), I know how it fits.  I didn't get the above underwear when I first started looking because it seems to me that it is going to be even tougher to wrangle the fly to the front to put the malleable STP through, due to how far away the fly is from the center of the underwear.  It is further away than the 100% cottton ones.

I will report back in!
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #51 on: April 19, 2015, 02:43:52 pm »
Trunks would work if you have a fly. :)

I knew he had a "real job". He's an older guy and it is like older guys to be responsible and hold the job. The kids go off and start a f-t business and then can't make it work. There are exceptions like Adyen D.

--Jay

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #52 on: April 19, 2015, 04:06:27 pm »
Trunks would work if you have a fly. :)

I knew he had a "real job". He's an older guy and it is like older guys to be responsible and hold the job. The kids go off and start a f-t business and then can't make it work. There are exceptions like Adyen D.

--Jay

Yeah, I never liked the look of a fly, so that is why I had to seek out new underwear after getting this STP.  I had one random pair of Jockey's that has a fly.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #53 on: April 19, 2015, 10:15:51 pm »

I think I know what you mean about people reading this. I'm guessing most of them look and say "omg, Brett and Jay are still talking about underpants." LOL

You really do need a fly so...

--Jay

Yeah, I never liked the look of a fly, so that is why I had to seek out new underwear after getting this STP.  I had one random pair of Jockey's that has a fly.

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #54 on: April 20, 2015, 06:32:33 am »
I think I know what you mean about people reading this. I'm guessing most of them look and say "omg, Brett and Jay are still talking about underpants." LOL

--Jay

It's all in the name of research!   ;D

I figure the next guy who purchases this EZP will have an easier time of it if our underwear experimentation is public.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline Jameson

  • Neighbor
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Reputation: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #55 on: April 25, 2015, 11:39:40 am »
It's all in the name of research!   ;D

I figure the next guy who purchases this EZP will have an easier time of it if our underwear experimentation is public.

Hey Guys, I'm reading! Undies and all. ;D

I really want to get one of these (Hey Brett, who tipped you off on the EZP? ;)) Even though I signed up for emails on the EZP from the get go, I've not heard from him. I suspect my anomalous email addy has something to do with it. I've been out of town on and off for the last couple of months dealing with a 'life event' and will probably be doing so for another couple of months. It's been keeping me offline for the most part but I do swing by as time permits.

I hope to get in on the next shipping batch although I can only imagine how long the line is by now, I need to sort out email with him. You guys are really giving great detail in your reviews and I for one really appreciate that. I think every question I've thought of has been answered, but if I think of more I'll be back. I will give a review in here as well when I receive mine. Keep the underoo debate going, I'll be needing to pick some out.  :)

Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2015, 02:26:36 am »
It takes a long time, Jameson. I just waited and signed up when the email came out. Alex has a "real job" and gets to it when he gets to it. He does get to it, seems like it takes him a long time.
Glad you enjoyed all the underwear talk. :)

--Jay

Offline Bimmer Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Reputation: +22/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #57 on: April 29, 2015, 07:56:59 pm »
Hey Guys, I'm reading! Undies and all. ;D

I really want to get one of these (Hey Brett, who tipped you off on the EZP? ;)) Even though I signed up for emails on the EZP from the get go, I've not heard from him. I suspect my anomalous email addy has something to do with it. I've been out of town on and off for the last couple of months dealing with a 'life event' and will probably be doing so for another couple of months. It's been keeping me offline for the most part but I do swing by as time permits.

I hope to get in on the next shipping batch although I can only imagine how long the line is by now, I need to sort out email with him. You guys are really giving great detail in your reviews and I for one really appreciate that. I think every question I've thought of has been answered, but if I think of more I'll be back. I will give a review in here as well when I receive mine. Keep the underoo debate going, I'll be needing to pick some out.  :)

Yes, you pointed it out to me, but you still aren't getting mine!

Jameson, Alex (EZP owner), just sent out an email saying he finally finished his last "willy" from the last round.  He said he is going to take a week or two off before opening up for sales again.  He does not keep a waiting list.  He sends out an email the moment he opens the door and he usually fills his quota within the hour.  True dat.  It then is about 5 weeks until he finishes them.

Last time he sent out a head's up email that he was going to be sending out an email!  lol  It you really want one of those things, I would put your name on the email list and then email him to make sure you are on it, since it seems to be giving you trouble.  I will forward you his latest email.

When he says he is going to open the doors again, you best have your cell phone on you and listen for the email signal so you can jump on quick!
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty): 3/2/16 (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta (Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision).  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. 11/11/16 (Crane, TX)




Offline aleon515

  • FTM non-binary dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,408
  • Reputation: +37/-0
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #58 on: May 01, 2015, 02:55:18 pm »
I agree. I responded within a minute of getting the email.


--Jay

Offline Jameson

  • Neighbor
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Reputation: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mini-review EZP STP
« Reply #59 on: May 02, 2015, 10:23:58 pm »
Yes, you pointed it out to me, but you still aren't getting mine!

Jameson, Alex (EZP owner), just sent out an email saying he finally finished his last "willy" from the last round.  He said he is going to take a week or two off before opening up for sales again.  He does not keep a waiting list.  He sends out an email the moment he opens the door and he usually fills his quota within the hour.  True dat.  It then is about 5 weeks until he finishes them.

Last time he sent out a head's up email that he was going to be sending out an email!  lol  It you really want one of those things, I would put your name on the email list and then email him to make sure you are on it, since it seems to be giving you trouble.  I will forward you his latest email.

When he says he is going to open the doors again, you best have your cell phone on you and listen for the email signal so you can jump on quick!

I will keep an eye out for his email (and you forward it to me if you get one), I hope I can get in on this round!  ;D

Then of course, I'll have to buy all new underwear.  :-\

Tags: