Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

BART: 1st Amendment issues mount over cell shutdown

Started by SandraJane, August 16, 2011, 09:45:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SandraJane

SFGate

BART: 1st Amendment issues mount over cell shutdown

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer

Monday, August 15, 2011

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/08/14/MNTC1KNC27.DTL#ixzz1VCeW5mE7

In 1967, the California Supreme Court ruled that a city couldn't prohibit non-disruptive political activity inside a railroad station.

That was before cellular phones were invented and before the first BART train rolled down the tracks. But it's a precedent the transit agency may have to confront as it defends its decision to cut off cell service at the site of an expected track-side protest last Thursday, and its long-standing ban on "expressive activities" inside the fare gates.



*note; Thanks to Tekla for digging this article up!
  •  

tekla

Thanks to Big Mike, who is a lawyer and has been posting to FB on this.  I've been too worried and talking about staging myself to think much about it.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Mahsa Tezani

Yeah, you know it's dangerous to protest in a train and annoying right?

Most bay area "protesters" are selfish nincompoops.
  •