Quote from: girl_ashley on July 08, 2011, 08:39:15 AM
Yeah that's definitely from the Harry Benjamin SOC days or earlier. The WPATH-SOC is way more evolved than that. Though, many therapists are behind the times and still operate on the old ways. But no therapist worth their degree should be claiming that you aren't serious enough for transition unless you go in a dress.
This is the unfortunate reality with too many therapists and psychiatrists.

The 2001 WPATH SoC always allowed for liberal interpretation, but people read it strictly so as not to risk any chance of liability. My therapist is a WPATH member and wise enough to know and appropriately use the wiggle room provided in the current (2001) SoC. The newer version is thankfully more descriptive of the broader gender spectrum and hopefully therapists and psychiatrists will be encouraged to provide more liberal interpretations.
During my telephone interview to start a new patient file with Dr. Reed, he asked how long I had been living full-time. I explained that I was not due to my age, marriage, job, male pattern baldness, and continuing need for comprehensive electrolysis. He seemed a bit put off by this, but at that time he had not yet received both of my referral letters. I explained the orchiectomy was necessary for health reasons, both mental and physical. My therapist worded it "
as Caith continues to explore and develop her evolving gender identity". Anyone who actually expects you to wear a dress and heels
seriously needs to step outside and take a much better view of reality, IMHO. Using those qualifications as a standard for femininity in women dates back to the 1960s or 1970s, and we've come a HELL of a lot further in the last 40 to 50 years.