Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Church Leaders Threaten to "Remove" Anyone Who Supports SB 48

Started by SandraJane, September 03, 2011, 04:20:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Julie Marie

Quote from: tekla on September 07, 2011, 12:05:31 PM
I'm not all that sure why schisms are such a bad thing, otherwise you'd all be Catholic.

You mean Ancient Polytheistic.

Funny how the earliest religions believe in several gods, many of them female.  Then the modern religions came along and killed them, including all the female ones.  I guess as in battle, so too in religion, might makes right.
When you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself.
  •  

Vicky

Schism has one more good point, the resulting new pieces are smaller and weaker than the parent organization, hate each other, and are still smarting badly enough that they don't trust other schismatics.  Divide and stonker!! 
I refuse to have a war of wits with a half armed opponent!!

Wiser now about Post Op reality!!
  •  

MarinaM

Quote from: tekla on September 05, 2011, 08:19:14 AM
They have walked this fine line since the 1840s in New York, and when you learn it like that,  you really learn it good.

Ah heritage :) No way to be both proud of a people and confused by their success like being born Irish Protestant. [/ducks out of the room]
  •  

tekla

Well most of the mid-century immigrants were overwhelming catholic, yet, that didn't matter much, as signs like "No blacks, no dogs, no Irish" didn't have a religious requirement.  And, in the 'melting pot' there was a lot less of the catholic vs. protestant in America and far more of an association with a 'mythical' Ireland.  It's like a lot of areas have an Indian/Pakistani section/area.  Where in the old country they were bitter enemies, over here (where we can't tell the difference anyway, and really don't care to) they have far more in common than what separated them in the past.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

gennee

Quote from: Stephe on September 06, 2011, 08:46:08 AM
What bothers me about all of this is: Why is the majority voting on the civil rights of a minority? Did they have a popular vote to desegregate? Or to change the laws about inner racial marriage? Of course not because in both cases at the time it likely would have failed. I don't get what's different about same sex marriage.

Nobody's right should EVER be put up to a vote. 
Be who you are.
Make a difference by being a difference.   :)

Blog: www.difecta.blogspot.com
  •