Quote from: Abstract on October 04, 2011, 01:45:14 AM
How does one know the brain is saying it as an aspect of genetic necessity rather then as a result of desire?
I don't think it makes any difference whatsoever. However, I recently tried to change anti-androgens, they didn't work, and I immediately reverted to my pre-transition status as psychologically dysfunctional without anything else changing in my life. That is reasonably clear evidence, for me, that testosterone makes me crazy. That and I'm not transitioning because of desire, I'm transitioning to escape pain - similar but not the same.
QuoteIt is not an assumption, it is a consideration. A question. ...just saying
How does one know whether they are thinking that it is physical as a rationalization or not?
Then why does it matter, is it wrong to simply be what one wants to be regardless of whether that was meant to be, a birthe defect or not?
Your question was based on the assumption that trans folk are trying to conform to an "appropriate" appearance. You weren't asking if people DO conform to an "appropriate" appearance. There was no escape clause in the sentence structure. Questions are often based on assumptions. For example, "When did you kill your wife?" assumes both that you had a wife, and that you killed her.
No, as I said above, I don't think it makes any difference one way or the other. For me the physical explanation makes more sense, given my lack of interest in social trappings of femininity, and the degree of discomfort with my body. It's all eventually going to be a moot point regardless. The medical evidence behind a physical cause is slowly, but steadily, increasing.