3D balls on reelmagik?

[emil]

So...I'm confused...i am looking into getting the 6 inch reelmagik prosthetic, but since it says on the website that the 4.5 inch one is the only one with 3D balls -does this mean the balls of the 6" are flat on the back?? when i glue it on, is there any angle from which it looks totally unnatural?
I sure don't want to get a prosthetic that looks fine from only one angle....
at the same time i wouldn't mind if the balls were rather small but still looked like they should. I'd actually prefer that, because since the dick is kinda large, with smaller balls it won't give me a monster bulge...

[Adio]

The 6" prosthetic has a flat back.  You may be able to see it from the side or back and if you moved the balls up/forward.  After they open up orders again, you could probably order a custom that would have 3D balls.  There are some videos on youtube showing the prosthetic.  I can't link them now but I'll edit my post later for you.

[emil]

thanks Adio! so the back of the balls isn't gonna be attached to my body right? from the review videos i got the idea that the back of the balls would actually be glued on....but what you're saying is the balls are just dangling there and the back is flat and visible?

[Finn642]

heres a good look at the 6inch reelmagik





and this guy reviewed his a lot, im sure he probably talks about the balls in some detail.

I'm a cis guy and ordered the 4.5 for a friend, imo i actually think the balls on the 6 and 8 actually seem more realistic for during sex. testicles kinda retract like that and balls aren't always hanging so loose like on the 4.5. wish they had made the style balls on the 6 and 8 not have that flat back.

don't know exactly how the flat back works but i imagine ur legs would block the back of the balls for the most part, tho if your using them for sex (and at 6 and 8 inches i don't see why you wouldn't) then the flat back might be noticeable at times.

[emil]

thanks...have been watching this guy's video and the reelmagik promo video so many times but i still don't get it *blush*
from the realmagik video i feel like from the shape of the balls it kinda looks as though you do glue them on completely ---like you said balls kinda retract during sex and that's what it looks like to me - retracted balls that are not dangling----but then again likereal and lolajake both have flat backs on most of their packers and don't explicitly mention that in the descriptions either and i'm really not in for a bad surprise..

[Adio]

Finn posted the links I was going to add.  The balls are not glued on to your body.  The back of them may not be visible unless someone is looking very closely from the side or behind (basically underneath) you.  Unless someone grabbed them and felt the flat back, I doubt another person would be able to tell.  I don't own one (yet), so I can't guarantee anything though.

[Finn642]

I haven't gotten the one i ordered yet, and again i bought the one with the 3-d balls, but my assumption is: the back is blocked most of the time with your legs and the fact that its underneath you. you only glue on the tab part (the flat piece of fake skin above the penis) and the rest simply hangs.

I know your able to pee without removing the packer so obviously the balls wouldn't be glued on or this wouldn't be possible. people have said the balls "feel realistic" so i'm guessing if they get touched from the front they feel legit but of course if they were cuped and squeezed you'd feel the flat part.

on a side note, i'd advise against lolajake. had a terrible experience ordering from them last year (before i knew reelmagik existed) spent way too much money on something that literally fell apart the first day out of the box. we ordered a medium sized model with 3D balls and foreskin and spent 1000+ on it. what we received was way to large for packing, the balls were huge the foreskin ripped the first day out of the box and didn't look realistic like the pictures on the site, it looked like the whole packer was just covered in flesh colored rubber. this devastated my partner who we had bought it for to basically be his dick 24/7.

I ordered a reelmagik literally to make up for the lolajake disaster my friends been using and is very unhappy with.

[emil]

thanks everyone! *sigh* so i guess i'll go with the 4,5 inch one afterall....i really don't get the whole flat balls concept ...

[Finn642]

don't understand how it works, or don't understand why they do it?

cause i'm with you on the not getting why they make them with a flat back. seriously is it saving that much "material"? even doing a ->-bleeped-<-ty sculpting job on the back side would be fine but just make them round and real enough no one questions em.

i decided on the 4.5 (with rod) for 3 reasons:

1. 3D balls, the balls on the 6 and 8 actually look more real to me (guys balls don't dangle as much as you'd think during sex or if its cold or if your doing some kind of sport or physical activity they tend to retract up) but I know my friend wants as close to a 100% real dick as possible so the flat back just isn't gonna work for that.

2.Size, 4.5 may seem on the small side but after ordering a 5inch model from lolajake and getting something closer to 6.5 and very thick I'd rather play it safe. my friend is only about 5ft2inch-5ft3inch and generally smaller looking i'm 6ft tall and about 7inches so we figured a 5inch model would look about right. what we got just ended up being too big looking for a person that sized and packing with it requires baggy pants or it looks like a semi hard-on. 

3.Foreskin, I'm uncircumcised and my friend wanted an uncut packer but lolajakes simply fell apart because of this. reelmagik doesn't have that as an option but the 4.5 seems to have what appears to be a foreskin ridge right bellow the head and looks like they modeled it after an uncut penis with the foreskin retracted. the 6 and 8 inch models look decidedly cut so i'm hopeing my friend will be happy with the retracted look of the 4.5 model.

If your really caught up about the size issue you could ask if they'll add 3D balls to the 6inch model, they have said they'd do customized models but I don't know how much that would cost and I would keep in mind being able to pack and your own body size when picking a packer. my friend ended up with something that's too big, and 4.5inches really isn't that small there are lots of guys around that size.

[emil]

thanks finn -

yeah i meant i don't understand why they make them with the flat back...i don't believe anyone wants flat balls...

regarding the size of the balls of the 4.5 inch packer i also think they're on the larger size, and i wouldn't have minded smaller balls....but their custom order prices are around $1000 if i remember correctly....
i'd guess that the bulge from the 6" and the bulge from the 4.5" wouldn'd be too different because one has tiny half-balls and the other comes with a smaller dick but full balls...

i had initially decided to get the 6" because i'm 5'11" and am packing with a 5 inch packer for now (and use it for sex --- i modified it) and it's ,....small. like it looks like a teeny tiny bulge on me and ...yeah. plus i thought what's the point in getting a prosthetic that looks like the real thing, when it's almost too small for sex (and sex being the only occasion when it would be seen by anyone but me).
*sigh* maybe i should wait some more and see if they come out with more different models...

[Finn642]

 your probably right about the 4.5 and 6 inch having similar bulge sizes.  your around the same height/build as me so i can see the 4.5 not looking right, especially like you said it only really gets seen during sex. not that height always has to do with penis size but it usually seems to co-relate somewhat like any other part of a person whos just generally bigger or smaller.

there have been a lot of requests for an "erect" size model with 3D balls so I assume one will be available from them at some point. just a matter of if you want to wait or not. tho they aren't taking orders til November 10th anyway. I figure they'll be focusing more on their packers once the halloween seasons over, so i could see them coming out with a new model shortly after they start taking orders again.

my friend likes to play the "bottom" role in what would basically be gay male sex, so although having a penis is important and a lot of the sex acts incorporate it the size of my friends isn't necessarily as important since its not really used often for penetration.

[emil]

well if the requests are there already i think i will wait - cuz i'd hate to get the 4.5" just to have them come out with a full balls 6" one a month later....
and even if i ordered november 10th, it'd still be months till it'd be here...so.....i'll just be patient. maybe there'll even be one with a girth that's in proportion at some point the 6 " with 6" girth is short to average compared to the average caucasian erect penis but girth-wise it's up there with porn-stars....according to the visualizer website at least...

[Finn642]

yea i mean no idea when or if they will make a new packer im just guessing they will since their youtube page and other places have had people asking about a 6inch with 3d balls.

can't really tell what the girth is like from the pictures, the pics where they show legs seem realistically sized. I know lolajakes was really thick  it was about 6-6.5inches (despite ordering a 5inch) but looked much more massive cause of how thick it was, and the balls were way too big. the "shaft" was the thickest part tho so that might have been the problem and why it appeared so girthy.

the reelmagik pics look like the head is the widest point (which makes sense) and if thats where they are taking the girth from the shaft might be a more "average" girth and not porn star level  .

just going from the pics with the legs and the video where its being handled it doesn't seem too thick, but i don't kno its hard to tell until you see something in person. I thought the lolajake would be perfect and it turned out to be far different then I thought so who know 

[Dantheman]

Hey guys...saw this and thought I'd contribute since I've purchased the REELMAGIK prosthetics.  I have the 6" and 8", and the balls are not flat in the back. True, they are not completely "3D" like the 4.5" seem to be, but they are sort of rounded off in the back.  They sort of have a flat spot where you can glue them to the upper inside of your thigh, but are curved in on the backside.  They are not completely flat like other packers I have seen and bought...I absolutely hated those.  They seemed so fake.  Anyhow, just wanted to let you know.  Enjoy the 4.5"...I should be getting mine pretty soon.

[MaxAloysius]

Just wanted to take a moment away from the subject to say; Finn, dude you are so cool. I wish I had a friend as awesome and understanding as you! What you're doing for your mate is really great, and I really hope the reelmagik makes up for the terrible time he must have had with lolajake! Damn...wow you're awesome.

Anyways, moving on, I'm not really sure about this, but are the balls on the 4.5 just a little on the large side? Or perhaps it's just in comparison to the larger models, but still. I'll definitely want the 3d balls when I eventually have the money for one, but I'm torn between the 6 and 4.5. I'm 5'5", so I really don't know what to do. On the one hand, the 6 might be too big for my body size, but on the other hand, I'll only have the money to get one of these, and what happens if in the future I want to use mine for sex?

Ugh, too much to think about...

[Finn642]

Thanks for the info Dantheman, sounds like your very happy with the reelmagik models and thats an extremely reassuring sign to me   

and MaxAloysius, Thank you SO much  Seriously a thousand times thank you!!! I'm flattered by your compliments  Just trying to help a friend out but its so nice to hear that kind of appreciation, makes me all the more excited to see how my friend reacts to this gift! 

I'd agree the 4.5 balls seem a bit large and its why i was saying i felt the style balls on the 6 and 8 seemed more realistic, if only they were completely 3D. But the 4.5 balls may just seem large in comparison to the smaller dick can't know for sure until I see it in person. Plus everybody's different, some people have larger balls not a big deal, they don't seem absurdly big and I don't think it will detract much from the realism.

The balls on the lolajake my friend has are very large, the whole things large, and they are full of air. the skin on the dick also isn't "attached" to the penis (hard to explain) sort of just a sleeve that is connected to the deflated balls... basically you can put you mouth over the head and blow and the balls inflate, this would be a LOT funnier if we hadn't been so unhappy with what we got. and water gets in there when you wash it or if you tried to shower with it on. Really really horrible job they did on it 

[emil]

Hey Dantheman, can I talk you into taking a picture of the 6" one showing the back of the balls? that would be really really awesome!

+ i totally agree with what Max said

[Finn642]

Thanks emil 

and i'd also like to see a pic from the back of the 6" if you can Dantheman. Really any pics or info or any kind of short review or something; what you like. what you don't like, if anything. that would be really helpful

trying to hear as much about these as i can and i've only really seen the reelmagik site, their youtube page, and that one guy on youtube who reviewed his. Heard mainly positive stuff on forum posts but i'm all about any info I can get.

[Adio]

Anyways, moving on, I'm not really sure about this, but are the balls on the 4.5 just a little on the large side? Or perhaps it's just in comparison to the larger models, but still.

I thought about this as well.  But I'd rather have larger balls/smaller penis than large penis and small balls.  Probably not the norm though.  4.5" is still enough for penetration, so I'd be fine with that.  I'm going for realism, both flaccid and erect.  Very few men have 6" flaccid, but 4.5" erect is more common (although smaller than average).

[Finn642]

I would agree for passing purposes 4.5" is far more realistic for flaccid. It's large for flaccid and on the lower side of average for erect. If your trying to pass in the Locker Room a 4.5" limp would probably be something to be proud of without drawing "omg whaaat???" attention that a 6" flaccid penis would get. It's true there are "showers" and "growers" but I don't think many "showers" are packing 6" limp.

4.5" is smaller then average but adding a rod (which you'd need if you plan on using it for sex) may make it a bit larger. lolajake mentioned the rod may add half an inch or so, and i BELIEVE at one point i read reelmagik saying something similar? I can't find where they said this though...

either way the average vagina length is only like 4inches and I've never heard of a women enjoy having her cervix hit, tho I've had them complain about it. So actually needing more length is probably more of an visually stimulating thing then physical. girths another story tho.