Tired of hearing "if he is only attracted to whats between my legs" / ->-bleeped-<-s

[Bishounen]

Even if you get the srs...you still have to contend with other things that make a person transsexual: bone structure, hands, etc.

->-bleeped-<- ->-bleeped-<-s are into post ops too.

The ->-bleeped-<-->-bleeped-<- that are into Post-ops are generally a different type of ->-bleeped-<- than the one that excludingly are after Pre-ops.

The ->-bleeped-<- that only goes after Pre-ops, does it because of the anatomy; a chick with a dick, and usually dumps the TS if/when she has SRS.

The ->-bleeped-<- that goes after Post-ops, however, usually goes after Pre-ops aswell including Cis-females too, as he is not attracted to the anatomy of the TS but the femininity, hence this type of ->-bleeped-<- usually don't care at all what the TS has between the legs, as he is usually not very interested in that piece anyways(If she is pre-op).

In short, the first type of ->-bleeped-<- chases ->-bleeped-<-s because of their anatomy foremostly, while the second type does so not because of their anatomy but because of their "air of femininity", as they often puts it.
But then again, the later type also goes after cis-females aswell as they simply loves chicks.

[Constance]

unfortunately because this is the real world! It all comes down to sex and what's between your legs. It sucks and is so sad!

But, I am in the real world. Before I can be sexual with some one I have to be attracted to them, and that attraction is not based on appearance or anatomy. That attraction is based on who they are as opposed to what they are.

I cannot be the only one is this world who thinks this way.

[Jen-Jen]

But, I am in the real world. Before I can be sexual with some one I have to be attracted to them, and that attraction is not based on appearance or anatomy. That attraction is based on who they are as opposed to what they are.

I cannot be the only one is this world who thinks this way.

yup cuz your shallow, dont worry your not the only one.  When it all comes down to it in the end, we are all shallow beings.

[Constance]

I don't understand. Wanting an emotion connection with a person before I can become sexual is shallow? I thought it was the other way around.

[Butterflyhugs]

I see it as no different than someone liking a certain hair color, or even a certain kind of personality. You can't fault people for their preferences.

I agree Lily

Someone can be attracted to me (my personality, character, etc.) and also be attracted to my anatomy. The two are not mutually exclusive.

[Jen-Jen]

I don't understand. Wanting an emotion connection with a person before I can become sexual is shallow? I thought it was the other way around.

you didn't say it was based on emotion.

[Lily]

But, I am in the real world. Before I can be sexual with some one I have to be attracted to them, and that attraction is not based on appearance or anatomy. That attraction is based on who they are as opposed to what they are.

I cannot be the only one is this world who thinks this way.

I am exactly this way. The soul matters so much more to me than the body.

[Jeneva]

But, I am in the real world. Before I can be sexual with some one I have to be attracted to them, and that attraction is not based on appearance or anatomy. That attraction is based on who they are as opposed to what they are.

I cannot be the only one is this world who thinks this way.

But an emotional connection is not always romantic/sensual.  The ones that don't fit our sexual orientation become really close friends, but not lovers.  It isn't that you can't develop a connection to someone that doesn't fit your interests, but rather that it doesn't develop sexually.

[Sunnynight]

I have nothing against ->-bleeped-<-s as a whole, and agree with what the OP is getting at, but in my experience ->-bleeped-<-s have been creepers. And creepers are creepy.

[Butterflyhugs]

I just don't agree with labeling anyone who is attracted to transsexual women as a "->-bleeped-<-."

There's an obvious difference between a man who is looking for a meaningful relationship with a woman, and happens to have a preference for transwomen...and a guy who's just looking to "try something new" sexually or just wants casual sex with a transwoman.

Both exist, but sadly both receive the same negative label that should only be reserved for the latter.

[Byron]

I just don't agree with labeling anyone who is attracted to transsexual women as a "->-bleeped-<-."

There's an obvious difference between a man who is looking for a meaningful relationship with a woman, and happens to have a preference for transwomen...and a guy who's just looking to "try something new" sexually or just wants casual sex with a transwoman.

Both exist, but sadly both receive the same negative label that should only be reserved for the latter.

Thank you for your perspective, Kristy.  I fall into the former category, and I couldn't have expressed my feelings better myself.  Thank you! 

[JenJen2011]

Why is it such a difference whether they are attracted to our penis or our vulva?

Because maybe some of us feel uncomfortable and don't like having a penis, much less a guy who is looking to suck us off or get ->-bleeped-<-ed in the ass.

[Rabbit]

Because maybe some of us feel uncomfortable and don't like having a penis, much less a guy who is looking to suck us off or get ->-bleeped-<-ed in the ass.

Just because they like different things in bed than we might doesn't mean they are bad or anything. It is just a sittuation of "aww, I'm flattered...but... no thank you".

I don't understand the negative reaction because they want something different than we can offer.

This is why straight guys react negatively (sometimes very negatively) to a gay guy who might hit on them... why not just say "no thanks" and move on without judging the other person so harshly for seeking something different than you?

[Constance]

you didn't say it was based on emotion.

Very well, I'll be more clear next time.

[JenJen2011]

Just because they like different things in bed than we might doesn't mean they are bad or anything. It is just a sittuation of "aww, I'm flattered...but... no thank you".

I don't understand the negative reaction because they want something different than we can offer.

This is why straight guys react negatively (sometimes very negatively) to a gay guy who might hit on them... why not just say "no thanks" and move on without judging the other person so harshly for seeking something different than you?

I never said they were bad and I don't see where I was being "harsh". I'm just not into ->-bleeped-<- ->-bleeped-<-s, sorry. If that's your thing, cool but I would not be flattered.

[Forever21Chic]

  I get pm's on here and other sites from "->-bleeped-<- ->-bleeped-<-s" all the time and they almost always ask me something perverted. I'm not gonna get into the details but sometimes it really creeps me out big time. 

[MarinaM]

  I get pm's on here and other sites from "->-bleeped-<- ->-bleeped-<-s" all the time and they almost always ask me something perverted. I'm not gonna get into the details but sometimes it really creeps me out big time. 

I don't get them from here anymore (I think the green row above the avatar wards them off), but yeah, it's creepy.

[Constance]

Wow, I've never been PM'd by ->-bleeped-<-s, here or otherwise.

[MarinaM]

Wow, I've never been PM'd by ->-bleeped-<-s, here or otherwise.

Had three that I can remember here, two on FB. Just the cost of being all public. None on YT yet, though. Also: they were after the male member. /shudders

[Mahsa Tezani]

I hooked up with a gay acting straight guy tonight. it was the hottest thing ever...

He was fascinated with post op transgirls though and was like, "You could be my girlfriend...Like a relationship. You don't have any trace of male in you"

OMG