
I've read the whole thing?
I get the distinct feeling that my gender therapist has not read it? For example: When I said that I think I would like to take it very slow, that I and the people around me needed time, so I would like to start with very slow, low impact, gradual change HRT for now, and perhaps an orchiectomy for both medical and psychological reasons. For now that would be more then enough. I might consider going all the way (RLE/GRS/legal change), if I really could not continue without, but that would not be anytime soon?
To my surprise the very idea of only needing some and not all, was flat out dismissed! It really seemed like the only options where either the whole deal or nothing at all? And then most likely only on THEIR schedule?
It gets even worse: She (and her two male colleagues) actually said that they considered it their primary role to act as gatekeepers. Badly informed gatekeepers?
The weird thing is that the actually people (Someone explicitly asked them on my behave) that you go to once you have passed these gatekeepers are way more flexible and my request should not be much of a problem there?
Does anyone know how a document like this is generally regarded in the relevant medical community?