Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Transmissions: More than birth control

Started by Shana A, March 08, 2012, 09:41:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Transmissions: More than birth control

Published 03/08/2012
by Gwendolyn Ann Smith

http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=67508

In yet another attempt to derail health care, mainly aimed at the Obama administration's rules for birth control coverage, Missouri Senator Roy Blunt (R) proposed an amendment to a federal highway and highway safety construction bill, S.1813. The amendment had very little to do with highways and a lot do to with playing politics.

[...]

Now it's important to note that while the bill was indeed aimed squarely at birth control coverage, the language did not stop there. The bill would have allowed any employer, based purely on their own "moral stance," to disallow any specific coverage. It becomes a much bigger issue than just the intended issue of birth control, and veers into the care of all people. More specifically, it could affect those who might refuse to treat some one because they are gay or lesbian, citing a "moral distaste" for homosexuality. And more likely in the eyes of this columnist, it would allow transgender people to be discriminated against in health care circles, based on a care provider's moral views.

Consider that many transgender's people are prescribed hormones and other medications related to a gender transition. Many may also be on medications that, while not directly related to being transgender, may aid their quality of life – say an anti-depressant, or a medication for restoring lost hair. Those who may have recently had surgeries could have prescriptions for painkillers or other medications. Under the Blunt Amendment, coverage for these could potentially have been disallowed.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Jamie D

The article is largely nonsense.  The supposed consequences of the proposed "Respect for Rights of Conscience" amendment amount to little more than propaganda.  As the amendment was defeated on a party-line vote, the issue is moot.

A more salient point, however, was formulated by Thomas Jefferson, who said, "No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of civil authority."
  •