According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by conformer, June 29, 2012, 11:00:14 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Arch on July 07, 2012, 04:03:18 PMStill, I think that the term "little boy" is clueless--not necessarily rude--and should be reserved for boys in the single-digit age category.
Quote from: Arch on July 07, 2012, 04:03:18 PMThis cracks me up. It's also one reason I carry a big briefcase. My buddy, who isn't trans, still looks very young for pushing forty. He is a prof, but he took a fun class at the local community college and wound up with a twenty-something social crowd. Heard lots of "insider" complaints about this or that professor, and so forth. Didn't want them to know he was in his late thirties and a professor, so he was evasive about the age issue. My point is that it doesn't happen only to us. People are looking younger for their age these days.Still, I think that the term "little boy" is clueless--not necessarily rude--and should be reserved for boys in the single-digit age category.