Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Implications of the Kolisek case for veterans

Started by CindyLouCovington, September 26, 2012, 05:57:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CindyLouCovington

This issue will end up being decided by the US Supreme Court regardless of whether Massachusetts decides to appeal.Trans prisoners all over the country will be suing for the same thing,and some state (certainly a Southern state) will definitely appeal all the way up there. And if it is sustained, it will be mean that not only convicts but ANYONE who is entitled to medical care provided by the Government will be eligible.For instance, VETERANS. After all, a state can only be required to provide NECESSARY medical care for convicts.And if it is necessary for them, it is necessary for everyone who is trans. And veterans are entitled to free medical care from the Federal Government.They are entitled to all NECESSARY medical procedures. There is no way that you can argue that what is necessary for trans convicts is not necessary for trans veterans,and since both are equally entitled to medical care at government expense,BOTH are equally eligible for SRS at government expense.It will probably take more law suits,but there is no way the government can avoid doing right by veterans.
  •  

Sarah Louise

Your probably right it will go to the highest court.

As a Veteran that case would be interesting.
Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •