Ok, I was reading this thread: 'On Dominant Narratives and Why Trans People Lie':
https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,128050.0.html. It's an interesting one and I wanted to add my 2p, but it's an ancient one and everyone has probably moved on to think about other things, so I thought this can probably stand up as a new thread.... I'm sorry I rambled a bit, lol... I have split it up to make it easier to read though; if you want to...
On lying and trans stock phrasesI also have used the 'official trans catch phrases', in the past, when trying to explain myself to people. I wouldn't say I was lying when I used them. It was more a case that I was young when I started trying to tell people what I was feeling and I didn't have the vocabulary to do it very well. Also, if you're in a stressful situation being asked lots of challenging questions that are very difficult to answer, it's easy to use some of the stock phrases as a fall back position.
If I was transitioning, I expect I might well still say to some people 'I always knew I was a woman', because if you are talking to someone who isn't really going to challenge what that actually means, it's a whole lot quicker and easier than a more in depth discussion... especially if the depth of their response is only really does this mean you want to wear dresses and have sex with men, lol.
On having always knownThe 'always known I was a woman (or man)' thing is interesting too, because that's another thing I have said in the past, but something I have refined my thinking on since. I think what people say about it has a lot to do with the way they think as well as what their experiences have been.
I am not someone who 'just believes' anything. I like to consider the evidence and then I may agree with a theory based on that evidence, until new evidence comes along which says that theory is wrong. If there isn't enough information then I just say to myself, ok, this is a question which isn't answerable at the moment.
Even ignoring very early memories of events where ascribing meaning to them later would only be conjecture and just considering more concrete ones involving feeling either one is or feels like one should be a woman – I still can't personally conclude they tell me I always knew I was a woman – no matter how far back they go or how many of them there are.
On what it means to feel like a woman or a manWhat does it actually mean to feel like a woman (or a man) anyway? It's not an answerable question, because it's subjective. I think, that as best I know, my consciousness and thoughts are merely a product of electrical impulses in my brain and I don't have any kind of spiritual existence beyond that (though that sounds like a nice idea!). Therefore, it isn't possible for me to feel like anything other than myself; any amount of subjective feeling I'm a woman or a man I might do is then just how my particular brain works.
The only conclusion I can then come to is that based on my experiences and what I feel, I can form a hypothesis that I may feel more comfortable interacting with the world perceived as female and if my body was female in form... and that hypothesis can be tested out by going out into the world and trying to interact with it as female. Which I suppose is how the medical profession came up with the 'real life experience / test' idea.
I can see that someone who thinks in a different way to me (say someone who believes they have a spirit) could take my experiences and memories and conclude they mean they always knew they were a woman... it's just not the way I think about things.
On when you can say 'I am a woman! (or a man!)'That's not to say I don't think I can't also say 'I am a woman', if one thinks of 'woman' and 'man' as two overlapping fuzzy sets. Ok, I'm not in the same part of 'woman' as someone born female, but if I say that the overall set of woman includes people who identify as female then I feel it is quite legitimate for me to say 'I'm a woman'. (Ok, it means some people will think I'm a loony, lol, but that doesn't really matter).
It also, for me, makes it easier for me to get my head around the dichotomy of feeling 'I am a woman... but I was born with a male body and I look male so I must be male... erk!', etc, because I can think to myself and say actually – that's ok, logically it does add up because I just belong to both the set 'woman' and the set 'man'... so,
I know it makes logical sense and maybe someday science will come up with an explanation of why my brain works like it does, and then uninformed people won't think I'm crazy! Lol
On the relevance of when or if people transition and some thoughts on young transitioners todayLastly, I don't think in and of itself when people transition or if they transition at all really says anything about the underlying causes. Categorizing people in that way is grouping people by outcome not by underlying causes. You can make guesses about causes based on outcome but I don't think anything conclusive, because I think the outcomes are due to a complex interaction between biology, personality and societal factors.
I can look at myself and see how you could have lots of different outcomes. When I see young children and teenagers now saying and doing the things I've done and parents who just say ok I've heard of trans people, you must be trans, let me support you... ok, I feel a little bit envious and pleased to see things moving on, but I also feel worried for them and whether they will be, or have been, sufficiently challenged to think...
...I also feel slightly envious of people, in general, who don't analyse things like I do, and just seem to operate in the manner of 'ok I think this... I'll do that... without thinking too much',... hah, lol!