Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Transition process in different countries

Started by Mr.X, March 04, 2013, 02:33:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natkat

Quote from: utouto on March 05, 2013, 04:42:04 PM
I personally think that systems that require some amount of time before being able to move on to hormones or surgical transitions are beneficial -- each step is a huge decision to make, and it's better to think it through extensively than to make rash decisions.
I belive it would be good to require people some amount of times just to ask the person of there thoughts, to guide and informate people and all those things cause yes it is a huge step.
however it should really only be to suport people for what they need.

if people need alot of times then they shoud get it, but those who dont need alot of times shouldnt wait many months to get what they want, neither should this kind of requres work as a check-point system, who descide whatever or not your to do, but just to guide you on the way.
  •  

Mr.X

I agree that some mandatory waits are not as bad as they seem. It can just be overdone at times. At some point I had to wait almost 1.5 years to get my first real appointment after my initial assassment to see if I was eligble, and that was just plain stupid.

However, the docs and psychologist in Holland are fair about it. They tell me they wish to speed things up, but there is just an overload of people who need help, and because genderteams are multidiciplinary (as in, shrinks and many different kinds of doctors have to work together) the process just takes ages.

I also understand that if you are hasty, rash decisions can be made. There are other conditions that sometimes explain the genderconfusion and hormones and surgery would just make the person regret it at a later point. In Holland they do not fear claims. I am sure we have to sign something too. But what they do genuinly fear is that the person regrets his or her decision later in life, and that must be prevented. A few months wait in between steps helps, because you do start to think and read up etc. It keeps the mind going.

But yes, waiting sucks....When my psychologist told me that our appointment on the 8th of march had to be postponed to the 26th of April I wanted to strangle him. No hormones for me for at least another 3 months. I can almost see my female body wring its hands with a grin "time for more torture, muahahhaha"
  •  

FTMDiaries

I think mandatory waits are a very bad thing.

Making them mandatory presumes that every single trans patient is the same - and we're not; we're all individuals with varying levels of dysphoria and varying medical needs. There is a world of difference between (for example) a 17-year-old who just realised 2 months ago that they're trans... and a 70-year-old who has known for decades but has held off transitioning due to family commitments etc.

I think the best - and most humane - way forward is for doctors to have the leeway to assess each patient on a case-by-case basis.





  •  

Mr.X

This is very true.

I should have said more clear that they are only mandatory because they simply can not go any faster, not because they actually want the patients to wait. And a little wait is good, but as soon as this goes up to months at a time between each step, it gets rather bothersome.

The psychological talk length varies from person to person. My psychologist said that sometimes he only needed 3 talks, and for others, he needed like 10. It's tailored from patient to patient.

  •