According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by peky, March 17, 2013, 08:17:20 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: peky on March 18, 2013, 06:34:29 AMQuote from: peky on March 17, 2013, 08:17:20 PMAtheism, notably the hypothesis that [atheists'] lack of social obligations encourages disbelief in God. The analysis is rooted in the compensator theory of religion, first proposed twenty-five years ago, but it incorporates a recent addition: the distinction between primary and secondary compensation. Social obligations makes secondary compensation important, because it substitutes a compensator for a reward that a person is obligated to provide to another person. The data show that Atheism is indeed more common among people whose social obligations are weakhttp://www.religjournal.com/pdf/ijrr01002.pdfPerhaps this^^^would explain the higher suicide rate of atheists. A WHO study showed that Atheist suicide rate is double of that of the Buddhists and trice of that of the Christians. The fact that more Buddhists than Christians commit suicide may be explained in terms that a fraction of Buddhists are indeed Atheists, or a subtle failure of Buddhism.A global perspective on the epidemiology of suicide. Bertolote, J.M., & Fleishmann, A. Suicidologi, 2002, Arg. 7, nr 2
Quote from: peky on March 17, 2013, 08:17:20 PMAtheism, notably the hypothesis that [atheists'] lack of social obligations encourages disbelief in God. The analysis is rooted in the compensator theory of religion, first proposed twenty-five years ago, but it incorporates a recent addition: the distinction between primary and secondary compensation. Social obligations makes secondary compensation important, because it substitutes a compensator for a reward that a person is obligated to provide to another person. The data show that Atheism is indeed more common among people whose social obligations are weakhttp://www.religjournal.com/pdf/ijrr01002.pdf