There has been some interesting discussion.
I posted the article for no reason except seeing it on Google news comments and felt it reflected an opinion that people need to think of.
I personally don't care for tattoos but then again I have pierced ears and belly button, but I suppose that is 'traditional' for a woman. I do interview people for jobs and I have to admit that often the first impression is the one that hits you as an interviewer.
I do get body language, dress, hygiene - oh hygiene - how can you go to a job interview and not have had a wash? And general presentation.
Of course the job itself matters. I was most amused by strippers having to cover their tattoos!! Geex.
Tattoos are banned in several police forces and even in some military areas, Special Forces in Australia were unable to have any permanent body markings. I'm not sure if that is still current.
I suppose the concept of the article was more on future regret rather than personal taste. It is easy to get a tattoo, it is difficult to get rid of it.
We live with our life decisions, no matter what they are. If our decision is frowned upon who is to blame? Us or society? I'm never too sure on the answer to that. Obviously I have made my decisions of how I live my life and I care not for what others think. But the decision I made was to live as a, relatively, normal woman. I will never blend in, not because of appearance but because of my personality.
I liked the article from LWhite, art is art, and defining art is difficult if not impossible. There was a thread that mentioned the man Buck Angel, he is quite famous and I was viewing an incredible statue of him, he and his tattoos are most impressive.
The statue is of him naked, smoking a cigar, for those who do not know the piece of art:


I found the information insert interesting.
Cindy