The claim that homosexuality is not a condition is a suspension of disbelief in contemporary neuroscience. Condition does not imply error.
The author discusses the removal of homosexuality from the DSM while making no mention of the definitional refinements in gender diagnoses in DSM-V. How are these processes not parallel?
What is truly conservative is an unduly restrictive attitude towards expression. I disagree with the author's reference to the outmoded "wrong body" paradigm. Echoing the thoughts of others here, I don't have the wrong body, I have an body I fail to identify with. I also have a specific set of target indicators that I do identify with but that are not currently present. In this light, I don't see transition as a corrective process, but as a progressive one. Education, not treatment. For me, becoming female is more akin to learning a remedial skill that I missed in school than having a wart removed.
Maddy