Quote from: Elizabeth on June 15, 2007, 11:53:07 PM
This site is kind of annoying because they use Harry Benjamin's name to make it look all official when really it's just one person's opinion. A person with no credentials, I might add. This person makes up their terminology and makes no citations for the things they say or claim. I think sites like this do everyone a huge disservice. This site is really promoting what they believe transsexualism is and it's contrary to what Harry Benjamin himself wrote and I have posted here on this site. This is just another person trying to pigeon hole people and call anyone not like them a sexual fetishist. Very disappointing.
Love always,
Elizabeth
I feel like you dont feel identified with HBS

But I feel identified with it, so please try to respect it.
To me it doesnt really matter who made this site, but what is wrote there,
and is all well documented in the site to give enough credentials to the content.
Listen, I respect you are a TG or whatever you are, please just I ask the
same back, I dont feel identified as TG or trans-anything but just as Woman,
born with the condition called HBS.
Have a nice day,
Brenda
I found 3 Sites more on HBS :
http://harrybenjaminsyndrome-info.org/http://harrybenjaminsyndrome-not-transsexual.com/http://www.sexreassignment.com/hbs.html 
Brenda
To put it in another words.
In
Lynn Conway's words:
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/TS.html#anchor279530Lynn writes:
Scientific evidence has been growing that somehow certain brain-structures in the hypothalamus (the BSTc region) determine each person's core gender feelings and innate gender identity. These structures are "hard-wired" prenatally in the lower brain centers and central nervous system (CNS) during the early stages of pregnancy, during a hormonally-modulated imprinting process in the central nervous system (CNS).
It appears that if those brain and CNS structures are masculinized in early pregnancy by hormones in the fetus, then the child will have male percepts and a male gender identity, independent of whether the genes or genitalia are male. If those structures are not masculinized in early pregnancy, the child will have a female percepts and a female gender identity, again independent of the genes or genitalia. As in the case of intersex infants having ambiguous genitalia, there are undoubtedly many degrees of cross-gendering of brain and CNS structures, so that while some infants are completely cross-gendered others are only partially cross-gendered.
More recent research indicates that the brain begins to differentiate in embryonic males and females even earlier, possibly before embryonic sex hormones come into play, and under mechanisms still not yet understood - with gender identity then becoming a complex effect of the interaction between earlier brain differentiation and later embryonic hormones. For more on this emerging research, see: "Brain development: The most important sexual organ", in Nature magazine, January 29, 2004 (Nature 427, 390 - 392)
That is why it is possible for some children to have gender identities inconsistent with their genes. In cAIS cases, for example, those girls' brain structures are likely insensitive to the masculinization effects of fetal testosterone, as were their genitals. Therefore, they develop the brain structures and gender identity of females, even though they are XY genetically.
That is also why it is possible for some children to have gender identities inconsistent with their genitalia and upbringing. In the case of the boys with cloacal exstrophy ("micropenises"), their brain-structures and CNS presumably did masculinize under the influence of fetal testosterone, leading to later male gender identities even though they had been surgically "turned into girls" as infants and raised as girls.
Those recent cloacal exstrophy observations are already having a profound impact in the medical research community. They are to the science of gender much like the Galileo's observations of the moons of Jupiter.
These are dramatic, unprecedented, undeniable observations that shift the previous paradigm of thought, and do so in an area of science that had been subject to much misinformation and taboo. In Galileo's case, the shift was from an 'earth-centered universe' to a 'sun-centered universe'. In the cases here, the shift is away from a 'genitals + upbringing' theory of gender identity to a 'CNS neurobiological developmental' theory of gender identity.
The implications of this paradigm shift are far reaching, especially for those who suffer from cross-gender identities. Instead of those gender feelings being considered to be "psychological", they can now be understood as being "neurological" in nature.