Quote from: Nimrata (aka LH) on April 17, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
Sat nam Silvergirl:
Yes I do agree that just feeling, believing, and knowing doesn't always equate truth, but not having scientific proof doesn't always mean that it isn't true.
yes, but the burden of proof is on the one making the claim, not on others to prove it's not true, otherwise i could say that there is a magical pink six headed dragon with a scorpion tail that likes purple M&Ms called Didi that created all the universe, following the same line you said, i could say that even though i don't have scientific proof, doesn't mean that Didi doesn't exist, but why should i say such a thing? like i said before, should i not believe in something until it's proven or should i believe in something until it's disproven? should you not believe in Didi until i prove her exists? or should you believe until someone proves Didi doesn't exist?
Quote from: Nimrata (aka LH) on April 17, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
I find that it's a common misconception among western Atheists (and even some religious/spiritual folks) that many religions view themselves as mutually exclusive. While it is true that there are some that see themselves as the only way and everyone else is going to hell, I find more and more religious scholars are more open, view differences of religion as being God's way of revealing Zirself to different peoples and cultures. I'll just use Sikhi as an example (because that's what I try my best to follow): we believe in one genderless God, but that all peoples and religions are equal. A LaVeyan Satanist, a Jew, Atheist, or polytheistic faith follower can achieve union with God just as much as a Sikh could.
what i meant in the previous post is that anyone could have a different view, and some would have beliefs that their god is the only one, and that with by you saying that they feel it's true that their prayers get answered, thus confirming the god they believe did it, it would confirm that they exclusive (according to their beliefs) god is real, creating a small problem, i didn't mean to argue that all are like these, it was just something that came into my mind though i think i should have thought more before saying it
anyway, let me try to respond regardless, i do not know much about religions in general, not even christianity or the bible much, since i don't think it's necessary to be an atheist, though as far as i know other gods don't show up in other religions holy books, that's what i mean about it being mutually exclusive, that according to the holy book, other religions or gods weren't present in their respective creationisms and therefore they don't exist according to that holy book
Quote from: Nimrata (aka LH) on April 17, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
Another thing that can make these discussions hard is that even though most religious/spiritual folks recite over and over again that they lack scientific proof, hence why it's called "faith" and not "fact", that any sort of "proof" they have is only proof to them or a few others who choose to believe them, we're still constantly hammered to almost magically come up with some sort of scientific data. I think it's a difference of mind-set sometimes.
well, these kinds of discussions, like this thread is, is to prove and convince others about something, in this case that prayer works, if such thing did, it must be possible to prove that it did because whatever answered the prayer would have left clues that it acted upon it
Quote from: Nimrata (aka LH) on April 17, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
I am fine not having scientific proof, because I know that the mysteries of God/Universe are more complex than my limited human mind can comprehend, so if I cannot comprehend it, I am unlikely to be able to find a way to quantify and measure it. I don't think the human brain is quite capable of being able to understand the universe enough to scientifically find proof for everything.
well, if i do not know, i'll just say i do not know, i won't jump to a conclusion that does not seem likely since there isn't proof of it, just because we don't know, doesn't mean that other explanations that invoke god are more plausible
you say that you are not capable of quantifying and measuring the mysteries of God/Universe, but by saying that you make an assertion that a god is real and that it is mysterious, which would probably require some knowledge and comprehension to do so i assume
Quote from: Nimrata (aka LH) on April 17, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
Back to another part of the thread:
I was thinking, that if I do pray it's kind of different requests than is stereotypically portrayed as being prayed for. I don't ask for things like "please help me get X," or "heal this person" or "let me travel safely". I tend to more say something like "help me discover what direction is right for me" or "help me learn to be less judgmental and be more accepting of others".
The things I tend to pray for would likely be completely impossible to prove.
Jap prem,
H
well, you may not pray for those things, but some do, so those objections i raised earlier could still apply to them
your prayers however, are quite vague, and the problem is that you are also working towards them yourself, so when it is fulfilled, how do you know whether it was just by your will to change or that god answered the prayer?