Hi. I cannot access your voice files sadly without creating a google drive account. so I cannot say anything on that. But you seem in about the same range as I am with normal speak when I speak very relaxed. When I do enough change that it still is not too much effort, I am at about 150-160, in the ambiguous area. Its possible to live there I think, but its not always easy especially when relaxing means to go down to the borderline again.
The 1/3 ratios are what actually some surgeons seem to tell people here - 1/3 is improved and good, 1/3 is same as before maybe higher pitch but more huskyness, 1/3 actually is worse. I could not live with those odds.
I have not been impressed by many of the results from Dr Thomas, but some seem to be good. I have not yet heard any really bad voice from Yeson, but maybe those who were disappointed (according to Yesons own stats it should be some small percentage) dont like to speak up. heard with some that the change was less than they hoped for, at least in the first months, it seems this actually does change for most of them though. I think no dramatic changes are needed. few people really need a 220 Hz voice.
The big advantage of Dr Thomas seems to be that he also changes the chape of the voice box, so resonance will change. I imagine it like this - Yeson will just take your voice, modifies it, lift up the pitch you can easily produce, cut off some lower pitches so you cannot reach them and they cannot be produced as undertones to your voice anymore. Dr Thomans on the other hand completely gives you a new voice - pitch, the way it sounds - all of it. I can imagine both procedures will be suited for certain people. If you never ever can make a feminine sounding voice, maybe it would be Dr Thomas. If you can do a feminine voice but it is just annoying and hard to keep it up, I think this is what more of the people who went to Yeson report as their experience
