Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Well I have recieved my python stp in firm

Started by Brandon, September 13, 2014, 12:50:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

aleon515

Yeah I agree with the assessment of Rodeo briefs as a packing solution. They are not cheap. You'd need maybe 3 pairs minimum (?). I think they aren't cheap.

--Jay
  •  

AdamMLP

Quote from: Brandon on September 17, 2014, 05:20:34 PM
Well I wouldn't say awful for 69 dollars its a pretty good deal, They just made it way to huge is all. Sometimes I really wish my bio junk would have developed correctly I am not a fan of buying dicks online and then me spending money on something to find out I can't pack with it or the colors off or anything at that, Its annoying and stupid. I wish my body was just normal for once.

There are other issues with it other than just being large. If you read the recent reviews on here you'll see that it's been poorly finished and someone's had already torn around the scrotum.
  •  

EchelonHunt

RodeoH harnesses certainly aren't cheap ($45-$50 - there's even a standard packer RodeoH harness that is only $25 and strictly for packing only, so no O-ring to use for STP purposes.) but if you ask me, if you have the funds, they are well worth the money. They are extremely comfortable (that I refuse to wear any other harness!), stretchy, machine-washable like ordinary underwear and they last a very, very time. I've had mine for a few years now and since I've taken good care of it, it's still in excellent condition even after having it washed numerous times. Best thing of all? I haven't had to buy a spare pair yet.

I have used the following packer and two STP devices in the RodeoH harness. Even though I do not have the python, I thought this would show a general idea of packer/STP use with the RodeoH.

A) Sailor Soft Packer (GV Soft Packer)
B) STP FITZ Packer 1 Sailor, Nipple Style
C) Model D STP Packer

Since A and B are flaccid and soft, it is easy to tuck them into your pants to create a natural bulge. I was surprised at how comfortable it was wearing both A and B. In regards to A, since there is no STP incorporated into it, it's simple as putting it in the "pocket" inside the harness, pulling the shaft through the O-ring and adjusting it so it is comfortable. the "pocket" is a cotton fabric that keeps the packer against the O-ring and also prevents irritation the packer can cause laying against skin. The "pocket" also extends to under the crotch area, this is originally for people to put pocket vibes down there to pleasure the user during sex BUT I thought it would be a convenient place to slide your packer down into but then again, if you had the STP device B, you might not want to fiddle around with pulling the shaft forward through the O-ring while you are at the urinal. Which is understandable, you just want to whip it out and pee!

The STP Device B with the Nipple Style, I had the nipple placed over the "pocket" and into position, ready for use at urinal. The nipple style is soft and flexible so it's not too much of a bother but YMMV.

Both A and B showed a natural bulge, even when sitting down - I had trouble finding the bulge myself that it took several camera angles to find a good view! :laugh: No spontaneous erection as A and B are flaccid and roughly 4-5 inches at the very most. Now, onto C. the Model D STP Packer has a shorter shaft. It pokes out ever so slightly while wearing pants, I would advise against skin-tight pants - you would be better off going with A, B or a similar packer/STP than C. Sitting down, it is noticeable, only if you know where to look. C is very firm in compared to A & B. I have tried pushing it down but since it is tiny and firm, it just springs back up. I had the cup shaped resting in position, ready to be used, the shaft pulled over the pocket and through the O-ring. I had my doubts about whether it would work or not but surprisingly, it does. The only problem is comfort may be an issue - there is no cotton between the STP and skin therefore it may cause irritation or annoyance. For extra security and paranoid reasons, as the STP could not be placed in the pocket but freely in the RodeoH underwear itself, I wore the harness that specifically came with C to ensure it stays in place. In all honesty, with C and it's own harness, you could just wear ordinary underwear that have a section in the front where you can simply pull the shaft out to pee, instead of messing about with the RodeoH harness.

I hope this was educational and I would link the photos I took to support my reviews but I am waiting to hear back from a mod before posting them. I don't want to get into any trouble! :laugh:

I got my RodeoH harness from Toolshed Toys, it's a store in America - they allow Paypal if you email them what you would like to order. They also have jock-straps that have been modified to use for packing - not sure about STP. It's under Gender Expression > Packing/STP on the website. Hope you guys find what you are looking for!
  •  

Brandon

Quote from: lxndr on September 18, 2014, 01:25:33 AM
There are other issues with it other than just being large. If you read the recent reviews on here you'll see that it's been poorly finished and someone's had already torn around the scrotum.

Well every product has imperfections, I am just saying for the price its resonable vs paying 185 for a peecock which alot of people think is to flimsy and the back creates a pool of pee also people complain about the realisticness as far as color and feel. Plus the EC is 3 in 1
keep working hard and you can get anything you want.    -Aaliyah
  •  

aleon515

It's a two and one but some people like the Number One Laboratory product (Models A and D I think, though could have gotten that wrong). They aren't 3 and 1 but are a bit more realistic looking. They have good reviews (generally). They have their own harness design that seems a bit unique. I believe the price is around $70-80ish US.

--Jay
  •