Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

peecock vs model d vs standard packer

Started by patrick1967, September 15, 2014, 05:40:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

patrick1967

Ok I am just starting to get stuff ordered n I have a question.  I know most of your standard packers ie Mr limpy etc are very flexible for easy positioning.  I really want to get a decent stp, like the peecock or model D mainly because of the genital coverage - big issue for me - but I don't know flex wise how they compare. I really don't want the look of a perm woody but the coverage is important to me. Anyone have any insight on how these models are to pack with
  •  

SWNID

peecock is very soft and flexible, and I could pack with it in the position that the funnel covers my genital area. Model D is much more firm and short. If I wanted to pack that way, it would be pointing straight down between my legs, which in no way comfortable for me, so i just pack with it flat against my upper pubic area.
  •  

Bombadil

yes, I have both and SWNID described it really well.






  •