Quote from: Paige_tara on November 23, 2015, 05:48:15 PM
It's more the original principle of religion, to promote a society of people that care for one another and all of 'Gods creatures'. Such as the 10 commandments, it would be a much better world if people lived by those.
I, for one, strongly object to commandments 1 to 4, and while 5, 7 and 10 are nice to abide by if you can** I'd rather not see them made into law. The rest are covered by all societies, religious or not, so religion once again fails as a moral guide.
What you call the "original principle of religion" is very vague and I would disagree that such an underlying principle exists. There is no single underlying goal for the foundation of religion. Judaism was essentially created as a set of laws for the Israelite tribes, to reinforce authority*, and unlike its Abrahamic successors it is much less universalist and less developed theologically in the sense that it even mentions other gods in its holy texts; Christianity and Islam developed in opposition to established authority (given the progressive changes Islam brought with its birth, Muhammad would roll in his grave if he saw the ISIS today!).
The reality is that it is never the "original principle" that matters, but the actual social conditions to which the religions are applied. Islam initially had a progressive role, with Muslim societies being some of the most advanced on Earth; nowadays, the trend is reversed, with Islam being the ideological justification for the worst reactionaries of the world (ISIS, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, the Taliban), although in Arab societies with a more secular, progressive outlook (
relative to the rest of the Muslim world) Islam was/is used in a more progressive manner as well, though still only as an ideological framework for the state (see: Nasser, Gaddafi, and of those who still reign, Assad - in general, the Arab nationalist and Ba'athist dictators). Christianity, Buddhism, everything - they have a similarly flexible history in politics. The very compilation of their holy texts is usually a political process, not an abstract theological debate in a vacuum.
And if you want those "original principles" you speak about? Well, again, we don't need religion for that.
*Of course, the origins of Judaism are a little vague, since there is no evidence that the Exodus actually happened and thus it's a bit hard to say how the history of Judaism actually began.
**There are always exceptions: do not honor abusive parents, for example.