By the numbers (well by the USA NTDS survey)* use your own judgement if your own country differs in amounts
The national TG survey showed less discrimination from cisgender than TS and CD.
The survey didn't divided non-binary, called gender non-conformity by birth base.
It does show the enemies of non-binary are the police (their not going to respect you, and are 10% more likely to assault you) and presenting photo ID when in-congruent. Also mistreatment in k-12, mostly verbal harassment.
Despite these setbacks, most non binary go onto college and more likely higher education.
Retail establishments and hotels can create problems.
Jail and prison is less likely.
Job security is much higher for non binary
Non-binaries are heavily FAAB in number. The survey didn't divide the discrimination according to sex at birth. From my own experience, not statistic based, the discrimination for MAAB that openly break gender roles, gender norms, and gender expression are discriminated very very high. The survey however failed to care enough to document the birth differences unlike the MTF and FTM differences which were well documented.
While the entire non-binary population which is 70 to 80% FAAB and 20 to 30% MAAB, is overall like 50% lower discrimination, I believe most of that discrimination is towards 20 to 30% MAAB norm breakers.
p35 non binary are the most likely to be mistreated in k-12.
p37 non binary are more likely to be verbally harassed by students in k-12.
p38 non binary are the least likely to be harassed by teachers during K-12. (most non-binary gender identity emerges ages 18 to 22)
p40 non binary have highest percentage of graduate, and college rates.
p52 non binary are greatly less likely to be "out" at work than the others. 20 to 30% less than FTM and MTF
p53 non binary are half as likely to loose one's job because of gender.
p54 non binary are greatly less likely to be discriminated in being hired.
p55 non binary are less likely to be denied job promotions.
non binary are the least likely to be underemployed.
For example. Page 57 shows MTF and FTM discrimination numbers together, FTM discrimination is lower that MTF in most cases. Then on the other side of the page it shows ALL and GNC (Gender non conforming). most numbers are lower than the other amounts for discrimination. Page 63 shows that GNC use least number of the discrimination avoidance tactics.
When you look at page 131 you see that in retail settings, non binary greatly receives the highest inequal and harassment mistreatment.
p74 non binary, only experience 1/4th amount the refusal health care workers to provide medical service.
p76 non binary are less likely, nearly in half, to postpone preventative medical service (checkups and sickness) because of gender discrimination
p117 non binary are the least likely to experience harassment in finding housing or shelter.
Also on page 132 is Hotel mistreatment, which is higher than MTF and FTM.
Page 133 shows that with government agencies, non binary receive less harassment. This is probably due to FTM and MTF requiring change of name, sex, and record difficulties.
Page 153 shows next to FTM, non binaries have trouble presenting incongruent ID and receiving harassment and voilence. which is normally harassment, ask to leave, or occasionally violence as shown on the graph on the same page.
Page 159 shows only half 52% receive respect from police, whereas 74% of FTM and 61% MTF receive respect from police.
Page 180 non binary are 10% more likely to be assaulted by police than MTF and 50% more likely than MTF.
Page 163 non binary are half as likely to be arrested by police.
Page 166 non binary are half as likely to be harassed in jail and prison.
page 168 169 non binary are 1/6th likely to be assualted or sexually assualted in jail or prison or denied healthcare there.
