Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Sinthetics

Started by sneakersjay, December 23, 2014, 11:53:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sneakersjay

So I splurged and bought myself a packer and an erection for Christmas, LOL.

The packer is 5", uncut, chai.  Nice weight, realistic texture and coloring, warms to your body quickly, doesn't harbor odors, is silicone for easy cleaning, very realistic skin feel.   Does give  a bulge if not contained in tighter briefs, though I will admit to enjoying going out in public looking a bit hung (but not obscene, LOL).  I use a homemade elastic harness and regular boxer briefs. The elastic mainly keeps it from falling down or getting knocked sideways.  I have also used the pouch briefs from Andrew Christian where I can stick the whole thing in the pouch without fear of it falling out.

The erect prosthetic is 7", says cut but looks uncut (wrinkles of skin below the head).  They also sell an uncut version that has the foreskin halfway over the glans.  My hope is that someday I'll get to use this to play with another guy and I wanted the head exposed.  They also sell a 5" and 6" cut version, as well as an 11" cut version.  I got this also in chai, and the ultrarealistic model with harder balls within the squishier ball sack.  Very realistic coloring, realistic hardness, soft skin feel, warms quickly, realistic feeling balls.

I think their products are totally worth the money if you can swing it, from a realistic standpoint (weight, feel, and feels like real skin!) and not outrageously priced.  I was first in line for LikeReal and was sorely disappointed (spent a fortune on that and it was not as realistic in color or feel as promised). Same with FTM prosthetics Australia: firmness is realistic, but color not so much and a bit too rubbery in texture for my taste.  I should sell those because I'll likely never use them again)(cheap).


  •  

Carbonated

#1
Would you be willing to share some photos? I'm thinking of buying the packer, but I'm not shure about the color.  How is it compares to the rm packer? (Think that I red a review on the rm from you, but i could be wrong) Does it give a significantly larger bulge? Is it harder or softer?
  •  

sneakersjay

I don't have a Real Magik; I stopped at the Like Real.  The packer texture is very similar to the Mr. Limpy only a bit weightier, but has that soft skin feel and squish, maybe just a bit firmer but still very squishy.  it will give you a bulge as it only comes in a 5" and is girthy with decent balls.  They do have all of the measurements on their site.  Will try to get a pic.

Of all of the packers/prosthetics I have purchased (and I purchased a ton, though I see there are a bunch more options now than there used to be so I can't speak of the newer packers/prosthetics) this one wins, hands down.

The closest thing I can liken the prosthetic to is a Cyberskin, only in silicone. Real skin feel, hard core but softer/squishier glans and underside; balls are firm inside a softer sac.  But much more realistic and no odor (unlike a Cyberskin dildo).


  •  

sneakersjay



  •  

Nowhereboi

Note that Sinthetics' cup styles vary with the length of the prosthetic.  I wish mine had a nice deep scoop like the 7".  Unfortunately, the 6" is much flatter.


---MK

"But for three years I had roses – and apologised to no-one."
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Yeah, I really like the look of the Sinthetics.  I think the weight is a bit over 10 ounces.  I wrote him and asked, but don't remember.  I remember it is heavier than RM.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

MrSeahorse

Is the sinthetics packer single density? And is it (for lack of a better word) floppy? I know some silicone packers are too firm to move naturally.
  •  

Going4Miles

Here is my review of the 4" flaccid, circumcised packer in creme color, that I purchased from Sinthetics.  I purchased mine with a flat back and not the cupped back, since I prefer the look of the flat back, but this is only my opinion.  I found that the flat back works fine for me, since the material is very soft and it conforms to my body shape just fine.  You have your choice of colors which you will find on their website.  I believe that their packers are made with a single density only, but their dildos are available in either single or double density.  The double density gives the dildo a more realistic look, but this is a much more expensive option.  Their packers are also available in either flaccid or erect form and either circumcised or uncircumcised.   

This has become my favorite of my packers because it is very realistic and is incredibly comfortable to wear.  It does create a generous bulge, but, unless you're wearing skin tight pants, the bulge shouldn't create too much of a distraction.  In fact, you barely notice the bulge if you're wearing baggy pants.  The weight distribution between the testicles and shaft are fairly even and both seem to be in the correct size proportion to each other.  I am okay with the color but I would have preferred a slightly lighter color since I have such fair skin.  They offer a vanilla color, but since it isn't pictured on the website, and I didn't take the time to e-mail them about it, I don't know what it looks like.  It could be in white for all I know.  Anyway, the creme color isn't bad at all.  The shaft and testicles are both incredibly realistic!  The shaft is a little more wide than I would have liked, but it makes up for it due to the fact it has veins on the sides and the head looks very real.  The testicles are in 3D, they hang just right, one is slightly larger than the other, and they have wrinkles.  The testicles look fantastic and I think they are probably the best I've seen.  Customer service was prompt and I only had to wait 2 weeks for my packer to arrive from the date I ordered it. 

IMO, this packer is worth the money for the look, feel and quality.  I would highly recommend it.     ;D

EDIT:  Unfortunately, I am unable to get the pictures of my packer to appear in this post.  The images appeared as "?".  This project ended up costing me about 2 hours of my time and I'm just going to call it quits.  I really tried but it won't work.  I believe the problem is with the link.  I tried uploading the pictures from my desktop.  So, if you guys want to see pictures of the packer, you will need to refer to their website.  I will now delete the photos from my computer.   
T: 5/1/2015 | Top: 10/4/2016
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Hi, Going4 Miles,

Thanks for the review and also spending so much time trying to post pics!  That can be frustrating, I know!   

I am seriously considering one at this point, but I think that I will order the samples before purchase.  That was why I wanted to see your pictures.  It seems to me that when people post pictures here they are more accurate then web sites.  Thanks so much for trying.

Although I think I would purchase the cupped back (just to try something different), it is good to know that the flat back works well.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

aleon515

Quote from: Brett on December 29, 2014, 05:19:35 PM
Hi, Going4 Miles,

Thanks for the review and also spending so much time trying to post pics!  That can be frustrating, I know!   

I am seriously considering one at this point, but I think that I will order the samples before purchase.  That was why I wanted to see your pictures.  It seems to me that when people post pictures here they are more accurate then web sites.  Thanks so much for trying.


I've very much noticed this one!! Sometimes they look like whole different products.

--Jay
  •  

Going4Miles

Quote from: Brett on December 29, 2014, 05:19:35 PM
Hi, Going4 Miles,

Thanks for the review and also spending so much time trying to post pics!  That can be frustrating, I know!   

I am seriously considering one at this point, but I think that I will order the samples before purchase.  That was why I wanted to see your pictures.  It seems to me that when people post pictures here they are more accurate then web sites.  Thanks so much for trying.

Although I think I would purchase the cupped back (just to try something different), it is good to know that the flat back works well.

It's frustrating that I can't get those pictures here.  My guess is because I'm working from an iMac desktop computer and there could be a compatibility issue.  Anyway, my packer looks a lot like their sample photos of the flaccid packer from their website ...  http://sinthetics.com/gallery/male-galleries/penis-details/.  The only difference is that mine is more pink.  I hope this helps.   
T: 5/1/2015 | Top: 10/4/2016
  •  

sneakersjay

Quote from: MrSeahorse on December 29, 2014, 10:40:53 AM
Is the sinthetics packer single density? And is it (for lack of a better word) floppy? I know some silicone packers are too firm to move naturally.

The packer is single density.  It is soft and squishy and floppy but its default position is down.  It does move easily up and to the sides, but if you let it go, it immediately goes straight down.  Not like a Mr. Limpy that will flop any which way. Definitely nicer than a Mr. Right, and definitely not rigid like the FTM Australia packer (nice looking but firm and totally rigid).


  •  

sneakersjay

Quote from: Brett on December 29, 2014, 05:19:35 PM
Hi, Going4 Miles,

Thanks for the review and also spending so much time trying to post pics!  That can be frustrating, I know!   

I am seriously considering one at this point, but I think that I will order the samples before purchase.  That was why I wanted to see your pictures.  It seems to me that when people post pictures here they are more accurate then web sites.  Thanks so much for trying.

Although I think I would purchase the cupped back (just to try something different), it is good to know that the flat back works well.

Flat back works well with the packer, the curve definitely helps keep the erect prosthetic in place and less apt to twist side to side.


Jay


  •  

Bimmer Guy

Quote from: sneakersjay on December 29, 2014, 08:33:42 PM
Flat back works well with the packer, the curve definitely helps keep the erect prosthetic in place and less apt to twist side to side.


Jay

Jay, is your packer the curved back?  For some reason I assumed that it was.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

aleon515

No it's not. Susan's doesn't allow direct photos like that. YOu have to use a image sharing program. I use imgur, haven't had any problems with imgur, so I'll say I recommend them.

--Jay

Quote from: Going4Miles on December 29, 2014, 07:49:33 PM
It's frustrating that I can't get those pictures here.  My guess is because I'm working from an iMac desktop computer and there could be a compatibility issue.  Anyway, my packer looks a lot like their sample photos of the flaccid packer from their website ...  http://sinthetics.com/gallery/male-galleries/penis-details/.  The only difference is that mine is more pink.  I hope this helps.   
  •  

sneakersjay

Quote from: Brett on December 29, 2014, 09:41:46 PM
Jay, is your packer the curved back?  For some reason I assumed that it was.

Look at the pics I posted above. The Sinthetics packer is sitting flat on the table; the erect model has the cupped back over the balls. And I'm assuming that's because of the manufacturing of the harder balls in the softer surrounding silicone.


  •  

Going4Miles

Okay, I have now joined and set up an account on Imgur.  I uploaded my photos of the packer on the imgur website and tried to get the photos here.  For some reason, the links are still not being recognized, yet, I'm able to view the photos from my album on Imgur.  As you can see, the photos are appearing  with a "?" below.  So, I really tried and am going to give up again. 








Here's a link that will take you to my little album I've created with the photos on Imgur:

http://imgur.com/a/yS9Ne?gallery#qFue1kM

Anyway, this is all I'm able to do for you guys. 

Miles   
T: 5/1/2015 | Top: 10/4/2016
  •  

aleon515

Yeah for some reason the small links didn't work (of course I saw the pictures before). Anyway want to say, these look very good. For some reason the front is less real looking but this is a very realistic packer.
Just spent $75 for the Junk Closet so I'm going to need to wait on this one. (I do like the JC packer and it is nice, just not this nice.)

--Jay
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Quote from: sneakersjay on December 30, 2014, 08:21:32 AM
Look at the pics I posted above. The Sinthetics packer is sitting flat on the table; the erect model has the cupped back over the balls. And I'm assuming that's because of the manufacturing of the harder balls in the softer surrounding silicone.

Duh, sorry (your picture).

------------------

Holy crap that looks amazing, Miles!  It actually looks like a curved back, though, when comparing it to sneakerjay's.  I dunno.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

Going4Miles

Thanks guys.  I'm so glad those pictures were helpful.  It was a lot of work to get them loaded, but I'm realizing that it was worth the effort.  Yeah, it really is an amazing looking packer.   ;)  I don't feel the least bit guilty for buying this just after buying the Junk Closet packer.  I look at it as a mental health investment.  The sinthetics packer is really helping me with my own bottom dysphoria.  The Junk Closet is also helping me, but not quite as much.  These are the kings of my packer collection.    :D
T: 5/1/2015 | Top: 10/4/2016
  •