Well,
I just read the same storyline on Planet Out and two thoughts come to mind:
One, when a person that is thirty-nine leeches onto 17 year-old boys for anonymous sex, it sure as hell is not going to do anything to halp slay the belief in the public that transsexuals are just gay men that change their appearance to attract str8 men. That is her right to do as she will, but it is bad news for the image of the people that get shoe-horned into her little box.
Secondly, this article in the local paper makes darn sure provide the information that she is pre-operative, because that information is necessary in the public to gain sympathy for the "male victim." Without that sympathy factor, you have no basis for appealing to the public ear for gay panic defense. They have been using that stratefy for years to justify beating or killing gay men, ala Matthew Shepard, and since trannsexuals are viewed for the most part as gay men (as noted above). The only way for a man to regain his heterosexual status, under these rules, is to show that he was a victim of a gay man "disguised" as a woman.
Ahhh, it's all so sad that men waste all of that time and energy on posturing, when the truth is that most of them are willing to get busy with other men if they can remain anonymous.
I find it hilarious that they can be so revolted by that which atrracted them. I think it speaks to their own level of sexual confusion and lack of self esteem.