Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Allen's "black guy" alibi ruled inadmissible {Another Rep, Another Mens Room}

Started by LostInTime, August 29, 2007, 07:10:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LostInTime

PlanetOut

Allen returned to the facility a third time, entered the officer's stall, said "Hi," and began a provocative conversation, police said. The men agreed that the restroom was too dangerous, and arranged to take a drive together to another part of the park, where Allen would pay the officer $20 in exchange for providing the officer with oral sex.

...

Both Craig and Allen are married with children, and both sport anti-gay voting records.

-------------------------
A certain Queen song is going through my head. "Another one bites the dust..."
  •  

Thundra

But he's not gay, hell no!  LOL  He just likes to have sex with men occasionally, but that doesn't make him gay. Of course not! Heavens! He has a family. How could he possibly be gay? What a joke!
  •  

cindianna_jones

Thundra, they are not gay!  Truly they are not.  Gay men know they are gay. They don't expose a lovely women and children to the issues of promiscuous affairs.  They don't lead a family on with lies and deep seated secrets.

They are perverts plain and simple.

Cindi
  •  


Thundra

QuoteThey are perverts plain and simple.

Cindi, while I respect your opinion, I heartily disagree. I attended the MCC for a long time, and made friends with a lot of the kind of gay guys you are speaking of. In fact one of them was an assistant pastor and did outreach to those men. He was involved in a long term, monogamous relationship with the choir pianist.

He would troll the spots most associated with MSM and instead of getting busy with them, he would talk to them. Do you know what he found? That there are a helluva lot of gay men out there for which this kind of behavior is the only thing available to them, because they are afraid to come out and be themselves. Their reasons were myriad, but the most popular were that they did not want to lose their standing in the str8 community [many were involved in church social circles with families], they felt it was too dangerous to be out [afraid of being dragged behind a truck], or a loss of income. Any of those sound familiar to you folks here?

Like people afraid to transition, because they cannot imagine a life outside of the one they are trapped within, many gay men are terrified of the stigma attached to being gay. Many gay men believe very deeply, that since many of them were like these guys before they came out, that if society were more accepting or at least tolerant of gay male relationships, that same-sex relationships would explode exponentially into the public conscience. And, if men were allowed to have those kind of relationships recognized in society, then a lot of those men could find a partner to stay with instead of having anonymous sex.

It's a really strong parallel to this community actually. If transition was accepted by the majority of the population, instead of castgated and ridiculed, and if surgery as an eventual outcome was available for all instead of a select few, than I believe that the population of post-op people would double overnight if not more so.

Calling men that are afraid to come out as gay because of a loss of status socially or economically, is as unfair as calling transgendered people that are afraid to transition because of the unability to pay for surgery, "not real transsexuals." Both statements are judgmental and inappropriate for this forum IMNSHO.

Further, judging people that have sex in public places as "not gay," is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of. There are many faces of gay men out there, and some of them are monogamous, and some of them are promiscuous, but I kind of think that labelling some of them as perverts because they do not conform to your puritanistic attitude as far as expressing their sexuality to be inherently wrong and judgmental also.

You of course have the right to disagree with me. But I am not into labelling people as this, that, or the other thing. I AM a perv, and damned proud of that fact. I do not conform to society's demands that I behave in any set way, and I resent any attempt to portray people that believe as I do, as inferior or wrong to those that believe otherwise.

Once again, I state that the problem with these guys getting caught as MSM is an issue only because their actions are hypocritical, not because that behavior is inherently wrong in and of itself. That which is same, sane, and consensual between adults should not be judged by those outside of that particular relationship. That IMNSHO.

  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: Thundra on August 30, 2007, 12:56:15 PM
QuoteThey are perverts plain and simple.
Cindi, while I respect your opinion, I heartily disagree.
Amen, sister!
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

cindianna_jones

The perversion is the hypocrisy.  When they spew hatred and venom, creating laws against the very things that they do, this is perversion.  Whether they be representatives of the government, church leaders, or family men who preach the gospel of hatred against anyone who is different, they are perverts.  For they pervert the very nature of their being, turning and twisting it into insult and venom, turning the hearts of good people against those in our society who are minorities.

No, I do not condemn those who are in an impossible situation. 

I call out those who would condemn them, even by law, and yet have those very traits that they so publicly despise. I also believe someone who is truly gay should be honest with their spouses.  It is one of the hardest things in the world, but it needs to be done.  To do nothing is mean and cruel to the family.  The family deserves the truth.

So Thundra and Lisbeth, I still may agree with you.... you know that I have much love and compassion for anyone with problems. But I have an emptiness in my heart for these bigots. I truly have a weakness here for they incite hatred against the very people they so desperately want to love.  I don't get it. I never have.

Cindi
  •  

Dennis

Quote from: Thundra on August 30, 2007, 12:56:15 PM
Once again, I state that the problem with these guys getting caught as MSM is an issue only because their actions are hypocritical, not because that behavior is inherently wrong in and of itself. That which is same, sane, and consensual between adults should not be judged by those outside of that particular relationship. That IMNSHO.

I agree, except that I would add that it should either be in private or with a consenting audience of adults. Cottaging does not have a consenting audience and some are not adults.

Dennis
  •