Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Are any girls that started transition as muscular willing to share their stories

Started by ClaudiaLove, August 07, 2015, 03:37:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wednesday

I get you. Had the same concern about muscle mass/built when started transition.

I wasn't into bodybuilding, yet I practiced martial arts (bullying) for some years.

I'm 5'6'' (168cm) and through a very restrictive diet (almost no proteins, less tan 1000 calories a day) I reached 114lbs (52kg). Most of the muscle went away, even the damn pronounced shoulders. At this point everybody told me (even guys) I was too skinny and I should gain weight. Well, I decided to start exercising (lower body only) again and eating properly (120 gr protein a day at least, rice, veggies, fruits, chicken). Despite I didn't exercised the arms/upper body (I just did some pilates, lots of running and lots of road cycling) I re-filled my shoulders and reached 128 lbs (58kg), mostly muscle everywhere.

As far as my experience goes, a very restrictive / very hypocaloric diet works but jeopardizes a healthy nutrition. Personally I don't mind to look a bit athletic, I prefer to keep on eating right and being fit and active.

Funny thing my brother, my mother and me have  the most athletic builds in the family. Damn, If I was so ectomorph just like as my father...
"Witches were a bit like cats" - Terry Pratchett
  •  

Lady Smith

I'm 5ft 11 and weigh 80kg which is actually the same weight I was when I was 19.  I used to be a heavy truck mechanic and was strong and muscular in my arms and shoulders.  After 24 years of HRT my upper body strength is only around half what it was and I've lost most of that muscle mass.  My hips and bum have rounded out and I just make it into having B cup breasts.  So even at age 61 I still look like I'm fit and in good shape for my age.

I must tell you a funny story.  After four years on HRT I was back living with my Mum and one day Mum asked me to take her car into the township and pick up a bag of coal for her.  I went to the firewood and fuel dealers and a big husky guy put the 40kg bag of coal into the boot of Mum's car for me.  Once I was back home I grabbed hold of that bag of coal without really thinking about it and all I managed to do was pull myself into the boot of the car.  Talk about laugh, - I leaned back against Mum's car and laughed until my sides were sore.  Before HRT I could have lifted that bag of coat without any trouble at all, but after four years of hormones I couldn't even begin to shift it.

HRT was the best thing that could have happened to me because my upper body strength in my truck mechanic days was getting to the point where I was distorting my skeletal structure and having all kinds of problems with joint and nerve pain.  After four years on HRT all those problems had completely vanished as my musculature now matched my skeleton which was a blessed relief.
I've just recently started to fully embrace my intersex self and I'm no longer trying to force myself into 'passing' as a woman so being androgynous doesn't worry me at all.  Because of that my experience might be different to yours.

Edit:  Others have mentioned diet so I'll put my hand up for being a vegetarian.
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: kittenpower on August 07, 2015, 02:23:21 PM
That's the problem with gaining weight; you gain it all over, so all of your problem areas will standout more. I've discovered through trial and error that it's better for me to be thin and less curvy with my body type.

I used to hope otherwise , now that the hormones and activity have changed . Maybe just get some fat deposits not muscle growth from the extra weight gained . Also because of the HRT the fat would go to breasts ass thighs ...
But these are dreams , i have the weirdest body , it didn't respond well to androgens , yet some features changed in a masculine way . Now it doesn't seem to respond to estrogen either


  •  

Laura_7

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 08, 2015, 03:17:38 AM
I used to hope otherwise , now that the hormones and activity have changed . Maybe just get some fat deposits not muscle growth from the extra weight gained . Also because of the HRT the fat would go to breasts ass thighs ...
But these are dreams , i have the weirdest body , it didn't respond well to androgens , yet some features changed in a masculine way . Now it doesn't seem to respond to estrogen either

You could try some changes in diet...
different fats... I watched a video of a doc explaining, he said to try avocado oil...
avoiding carbonated drinks, and too much carbs...

and as others have experienced, a more vegetarian diet might help.
  •  

hvmatt

Thats me in my avatar 3 months ago.I'm 6 foot tall and anything from 73 to 75 kilos depending on fluid intake etc.I only really  do lower body exercise but thats just because thats what I enjoy and fitness is a happy side effect of having fun.I'm in the same weight range now as I was before transition but after both FFS and SRS I went down to 69kg.In each case it took over a year for the weight to come back. To be honest I havent had to deal with having big muscles-my build being tall and slim and sort of built for cycling,running long distance.But saying that I dont really like the width of my shoulders or my foot size.I guess we all have bits of us that bother us a bit.
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Laura_7 on August 08, 2015, 04:32:49 AM
You could try some changes in diet...
different fats... I watched a video of a doc explaining, he said to try avocado oil...
avoiding carbonated drinks, and too much carbs...

and as others have experienced, a more vegetarian diet might help.


Thank you for the reply ,

I am eating in a close to paleo / wapf style , so i eat a lot of fats , mostly saturated ( which even the ' scientists ' agreed now that are the healthy one ):  butter , lard , coconut oil , ... Also i eat sardnies and pastured eggs for enough omega 3 .
I don't eat any food with ingredients , so to speak . One could say i eat packaged foods but they are the unprocessed , single ingredient foods , every thing must be contained in a package  . Other than that i don't eat or drink junk food , so no carbonated drinks or processed carbs .
And my opinion is that vegetarian / vegan is unhealthy so i am not going there anytime soon .
I guess the only option nutrition wise is a crash diet , eating close to nothing  , like in my teens and like Wednesday said . But i am scared i will only lose more , i mean even my hair , it is already falling due to stress and a surgery i had . If i lose it all i will need 3-4 years or more to regrow it and in this time i could lose the muscle slowly .
Not to mention the thyroid problems i could get and many others .


  •  

Laura_7

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 08, 2015, 04:42:28 AM

I guess the only option nutrition wise is a crash diet , eating close to nothing  , like in my teens and like Wednesday said . But i am scared i will only lose more , i mean even my hair , it is already falling due to stress and a surgery i had . If i lose it all i will need 3-4 years or more to regrow it and in this time i could lose the muscle slowly .
Not to mention the thyroid problems i could get and many others .

There is no need to rush things. A gradual change in the right direction should help much.

And it might stick better.


QuoteAnd my opinion is that vegetarian / vegan is unhealthy

Why ? I read an analysis that people were predominantly vegetarians before an ice age. Plants were abundant, and there was no need to hunt that much.
Only after plants were less abundant people resorted to eating more meat.
Well those times are over. There is a huge variety of plants available.

The body is able to process both plant and non plant food. It even needs plant food, a purely non vegetarian diet cannot be sustained without artificial additions.

There are analyses saying that processing plant food is less straining for the body, especially compared to red meat.

And there are millions of healthy vegetarians worldwide showing that a diet can be healthy.

If you picture a vegetarian it is rarely an overweight or very muscular person. Rather a well toned person.

As others have pointed out, eating more vegetarian helped them.

You might try by cutting on red meat, switching to lean meat like poultry and cutting the overall amount gradually.
Instead maybe lentils and beans, and fresh cooked vegetables... which also taste delicios.
Some of them taste very delicious grilled or fried, like eggplant.

Some recipes are delicious and easy... selfmade flatbread with salad and tomatoes or onions...
soups with onions... etc...

hugs
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Laura_7 on August 08, 2015, 05:48:43 AM
There is no need to rush things. A gradual change in the right direction should help much.

And it might stick better.


Why ? I read an analysis that people were predominantly vegetarians before an ice age. Plants were abundant, and there was no need to hunt that much.
Only after plants were less abundant people resorted to eating more meat.
Well those times are over. There is a huge variety of plants available.

The body is able to process both plant and non plant food. It even needs plant food, a purely non vegetarian diet cannot be sustained without artificial additions.

There are analyses saying that processing plant food is less straining for the body, especially compared to red meat.

And there are millions of healthy vegetarians worldwide showing that a diet can be healthy.

If you picture a vegetarian it is rarely an overweight or very muscular person. Rather a well toned person.

As others have pointed out, eating more vegetarian helped them.

You might try by cutting on red meat, switching to lean meat like poultry and cutting the overall amount gradually.
Instead maybe lentils and beans, and fresh cooked vegetables... which also taste delicios.
Some of them taste very delicious grilled or fried, like eggplant.

Some recipes are delicious and easy... selfmade flatbread with salad and tomatoes or onions...
soups with onions... etc...

hugs


I feel overwhelmed to talk about this , it's such a huge topic and also usually people become angry and all becomes  kind of a doctrinary fight , losing the only fact that matters , our health .
Basically one of the things i realized when i was overwhelmed by nutrition is that there is no need for science , studies , ... , only common sense , eat what your ancestors did , the real  ones - many generations away , no grandma that might be into junk food too .

There are millions of smokers around that look healthy , that doesn't prove anything .

I don't even try to find or debate if a civilisation who maybe wouldn't have eaten meat , because that is not the point , the point is that at least the majority ( although i believe all ) evolved into eating meat too .
Beside there are many nutrients only found in reasonable amounts and absorbable states , in meat . And this is what we know now . It is like breast milk or in fact all the real foods  , we only know part of the substances they contain , there is no substitute made for them because we don't know yet all the conmponents and their role . We could just eat what we ate for hundreds of thousands of years and end the debate here .

Veganism is clearly bringing a lot of defficiencies :  b12 , d3 , omega 3 in the states we need most DHA and EPA , vitamin A as vitamin A not betacarotene , minerals in the absorbable forms . heme iron , ..., just too many

And also people didn't always need to hunt , we were scavengers too , We were opportunists .

Beside the animal products are just ready for absorbtion . It doesn't really matters how much we ingest but how much we absorb . If i ate a piece of iron i wouldn't absorb much fom it . Or a piece of calcium containing mineral deposit , it will just pass through the system .

Plants are ok , some of them , and they complete a healthy diet , but care should be made in quantities and preparation . I don't eat grains at all , except maybe for rice from time to time ( a pseudo-grain ) .
There are just so many chemicals in most of the plants people eat , and they also don't prepare them properly .

Think it this way , a plant is an organism , who wants to live and reproduce . It does not to be eaten . The parts that are ok to eat are the parts the plant designed them so : usually  the fruits , these can be eaten although many have different risks : tomatoes are technically fruits and they are part of the nightshades so some people need to be careful with them , ...
Other parts are ok to eat but prepared thoroughly , or else the nutrients won't be absorbed and , even worse they will damage a lot : grains and legumes need to be soaked or even sprouted especially for the phytic acid to be neutralized, yet for that they need to be raw to begin with ( almonds are pasteurised in the us and they don't respond to soaking sprouting as much , rolled oats have the phytase destroyed and also the soaking doesn't do much) .

Others have a lot of oxalates , others have purines  , most of them have lectins ( and the vegetable form of lectins are worse than the animal ones - they can even destroy the insects digestive tract if they try to eat them ) ,  and so on .

Soy is hopeless , except for the natto , which is fermented enough , soy has just too many , lectins , oxalates , a lot of phytic acid that doesn't neutralize easily , phytoestrogens , ...


The cruciferous are well known as healthy plants yet they have a lot of oxalates and affect the thyroid ( manifest goitrogenic effects ) . They should be cooked well and the water thrown away , not used in the dish .

The ' scientists ' tried to make people eat whole grains for the fiber and extra minerals , the truth is that those fibers are damaging our guts and the minerals are just locked by the other substances in the bran .

Many plants we eat are growing in depleted soils , also many species are GMO , and virtually all are sprayed ( even the bio industry / standards allow some pesticides )

Vegetable fats - PUFA specifically are really unhealthy - so except for the coconut and red palm oil , they sohuld be avoided .

Animals proteins are complete proteins , only a few plants have complete proteins and even there the aminoacid proportions varies .
Think it this way - animals are similar , it is easier to use something similar in a construction or renovation than to get a totally different material and convert it .

There is just too much , but if you wish you can have a look on the WAPF site or thehealthyhomeeconomist.com , they have great articles .

The thing is that both vegetarian and vegan diet are doctrines , are antropic concepts , and we don't really need to think our nutrition . I mean people have this stupid pride that we are superior to other animals yet the people also don't know yet what to eat - a thing all the animals just do .

Anyway , it's just a part of my point , i am working now and can't focus much .


  •  

Laura_7

Well this can be discussed without getting too personal... or angry...

Quote
Beside there are many nutrients only found in reasonable amounts and absorbable states , in meat . And this is what we know now . It is like breast milk or in fact all the real foods  , we only know part of the substances they contain , there is no substitute made for them because we don't know yet all the conmponents and their role .
There are quite a few facts not yet understood.
For example there were studies concerning where hens get the materials for their eggs from since materials taken in and put into eggs didn't add up.
It was found out that they were able to synthesize some from other products they take in.
The body is capapble to more than many people believe.

Quote
Basically one of the things i realized when i was overwhelmed by nutrition is that there is no need for science , studies , ... , only common sense , eat what your ancestors did , the real  ones - many generations away , no grandma that might be into junk food too .

Well I'd agree but I'd see it a bit diverse:
-eating what the body likes. Its often the body shows by a kind of craving what is missing. (And I don't menan chocolate :) This is like an addiction, not a normal need).
This can be of course directed, like using plant sources if desired...
-there were different styles of nutrition for different people. For scholars etc a different diet for example.

Well an animal usually feeds of plants. So 10 times the amount of weight has to be fed in plants for each kg.
There is also a multiple in substances taken in, it adds up. This is one reason why liver from animals should be eaten sparesly because of added substances there.

Feeding from plants could be less harmful therefore, because there is no multiple.

Well I'd see it similar that non vegetarian foods might be more easily built into the body. But if the goal is to lose muscle this might not be helpful.
Another point is that with non vegetarian sources there are a few substances which might have a reaction on the body.
Stress hormones included there produced during the last hours of the animal might have an influence with intake.

I personally would go with the food craving, pick more plant sources and look for ethical and sound souces all in all.

Additionally often it can be intuitively told if something holds a lot of energy or if it doesn't.

  •  

Fashionite

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 07, 2015, 06:00:06 AM
Thank you :)

I am 5' 11" , a little large framed , with thick bones . I would gain weight - and love it , i mean i loooove to eat   -  but i am scared not to ' fill ' up the muscles too . My hope was that the transition fairy would come and make me skinny and then i would round up from scratch .

Hey girl, I am totally there with you.  I started out as a muscular woman, as I was a competitive male gymnast, and I have lost about forty pounds from the start of muscle. Unfortunately, a lot of that has to do with the atrophy of the muscles as you know, which in turn has caused my to gain some unwanted fat, as I too LOVE to eat. I am just now starting to get it under control, as I really don't like the feeling of fat in any way shape or form. I just want to be tight and right. The walks are good, and keeping the low protein helps as well. Sometimes, and I think what happen with me even though i dont suggest it is that I was had a lot of days of depression where I was inside alone in my apartment where I would just stay in bed. It was kinda like being sick, so as i wasnt using those muscles they lost the male bulkiness.  Good luck and keep it up, I cant tell much bulk from the photo, but i understand what you mean about not wanting that athletes look as a woman. It is just not for some of us.
  •  

Serverlan

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 08, 2015, 04:42:28 AM

And my opinion is that vegetarian / vegan is unhealthy so i am not going there anytime soon .


Not necessarily a solid case for vegetarianism, but research has shown for quite a while now that caloric restrictions extend life. More related to vegetarianism perhaps, is a later study that shows how life expectancy enjoyed by those restricting calorie intake can be replicated by way of a high-carb/low-protein diet. There is of course some associated debate regarding the type and quality of carbs and proteins that we should be consuming, the ratio of carbs to protein and whether it's better to have fasting days -- and the ratio of fast vs meal days -- or to have a more consistent calorie restriction diet.


  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Laura_7 on August 08, 2015, 07:23:15 AM
Well this can be discussed without getting too personal... or angry...
There are quite a few facts not yet understood.
For example there were studies concerning where hens get the materials for their eggs from since materials taken in and put into eggs didn't add up.
It was found out that they were able to synthesize some from other products they take in.
The body is capapble to more than many people believe.

Well I'd agree but I'd see it a bit diverse:
-eating what the body likes. Its often the body shows by a kind of craving what is missing. (And I don't menan chocolate :) This is like an addiction, not a normal need).
This can be of course directed, like using plant sources if desired...
-there were different styles of nutrition for different people. For scholars etc a different diet for example.

Well an animal usually feeds of plants. So 10 times the amount of weight has to be fed in plants for each kg.
There is also a multiple in substances taken in, it adds up. This is one reason why liver from animals should be eaten sparesly because of added substances there.

Feeding from plants could be less harmful therefore, because there is no multiple.

Well I'd see it similar that non vegetarian foods might be more easily built into the body. But if the goal is to lose muscle this might not be helpful.
Another point is that with non vegetarian sources there are a few substances which might have a reaction on the body.
Stress hormones included there produced during the last hours of the animal might have an influence with intake.

I personally would go with the food craving, pick more plant sources and look for ethical and sound souces all in all.

Additionally often it can be intuitively told if something holds a lot of energy or if it doesn't.

As o matter of fact they are :  if you want more omega 3 they feed the chicken with omega 3 containing seeds ( flax , walnuts) although naturally they would eat insects for this task , if you want the eggs to have more selenium they supplement with selenium , if you want the bright orange yolk they feed them more  beta-carotene ....

About cravings , even more of my point : i crave meat everyday, so i guess there is  an extra reason to eat it .
Plants have way more substances that affect us than the animal meats have , put it this way , animals are similar to us , it's a regeneration circle , we eat to replace what is catabolized and also to create hormones , neurotransmitters and so on - what is better , something really similar to us or a seed that only wish to germinate and use all the methods for the animals not to eat it or if eaten to be evacuated in the animal's 'poop ' . Have you heard of so many plants which have the fruits eaten by animals and  then their seeds are spread as the animals digestion eliminate them ? Well , grains and legumes ( beans , peanuts , ...) are seeds , they are not easily digestible  . Nor are the leafy greens , their nutrients are highly bond inside .

Kids don't need a different nutrition , the principles are the same , only the quantities vary . The fact that the ' modern ' society use to do it differently doesn't mean it is ok . Normal is not ok . The fact that one in two children have a chronical illness like overweight , ADHD , ... ,  may be normal this days but it is not ok .

Liver is liver , from a grass fed animal or , in general , from an animal that was not farmed , it is on the top foods ever possible . The toxins are not staying there in a healthy animals . Nor in other organs . Think that many antic civilisations used to eat only the organ meats and throw the muscle meat to the dogs . You can check Chris Kresser's site for this  .
Also people nowadays are blaming foods in a wrong way : blame dairy , blame meat , but not these are the problem , the problem is how these were produced .  If you grow a salad in a polluted soil with polluted water and fertilizer it wil be toxic also .

Calories in foods are not as easy to see .
Take a milkshake from many fastfoods , some go up to 1200 kcals in a single serve .
Or take peanuts , avocados , .. . I used to eat like 300 grams of peanuts (made butter) in 5 minutes , and then i would complain to my girl friends : ' i just ate 2000 kcals ' , and they really made it clear they had no clue that the peanuts are so caloric dense .

Also it is all about the metabolism and the body's point of balance . This week i ate 26000 kcals already in less than 7 days (  dieting .. i know) , and i didn't gained anything visible  despite i eat a lot since many months now . Nor do i lose if i diet like i did last year .

I know the goal is to lose muscle but there is no point in adopting an unhealthy lifestyle . It's like people smoking to lose fat . I could just as well maintain the omnivorous style and diet really intense for a month , not eating anything , then restart eating normally , and repeat this in a few months so that the metabolism doesn't slows too much .

Also , as a side note , it is said that stress hormones destroys muscle , well , not for me , i used to cry every single day , from waking up till sleeping , and only slept for 2 hours a night and so one , the muscles are still here .




  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Serverlan on August 08, 2015, 11:33:17 PM
Not necessarily a solid case for vegetarianism, but research has shown for quite a while now that caloric restrictions extend life. More related to vegetarianism perhaps, is a later study that shows how life expectancy enjoyed by those restricting calorie intake can be replicated by way of a high-carb/low-protein diet. There is of course some associated debate regarding the type and quality of carbs and proteins that we should be consuming, the ratio of carbs to protein and whether it's better to have fasting days -- and the ratio of fast vs meal days -- or to have a more consistent calorie restriction diet.

Again , i really don't trust ' studies ' , i trust common sense , i trust the p[rinciple of just eat what we ate since ever . Studies are biased in sooooooo many ways , there are studies even about that , the ' bias of the studies ' , whereas the persons who support the study or the doctrines of the people who make the study affects in a decisive way the conclusion .
There are people , the inuits , who lived there for ages and didn't have fruits or legumes , they ate fish , seals , ... and they have one of the healthiest populations overall .
Yet maybe a complete carnivorous diet would not be good for me either , my ancestors ate some fruits and little vegetables too .  Just follow your instincts and common sense . Free your mind of what you learned and from the doctrines . There is no ethic here . Even the vegans would kill cockroaches in their homes or internal parasites if they know they have it . It's about survival and situations , we need to at we eat .
The problem with the humans is that we think and then we think we are superior because we thought . Many things are just meant to be done , to be live . There is the peace and the equilibrum . Lets just respect the ' animals ' by watching them , learning from them , seeing that we are the same even that they don' t use IPhones . 

So called scientists have it wrong all the time :  cholesterol is bad , saturated fats are bad , breastfeeding is bad , smoking is good , use Mercury to treat sexual diseases , use heroin as a treatment , eat soy , eat trans fats , eat pufa , eat grains , and so on . I don't have the means to post the posters scientists use to have as medical advices , just soo wrong . Now the medical comunity accepted they were wrong in most of the cases , yet no head has fallen , maybe they should be a little more scared prior to do such assumptions and even impose them . Think of the children vaccinated although the vaccines do more harm thatgood , think forced cessareans , forced ombilical cord clamping , all the things they do .
I am not an activist nor a conspiration theory's enthusiast , but Big Pharma exists , Big Food exists , we all are just some lab animals here . I mean come on , a conventional cancer treatment costs like 800 000 to 1 million dollars , of course they want people sick and also just ' treated ' not healed or prevented .  Of course they block alternative medicine as they call it , natural homeopath treatments that cost peanuts and have no patent for them to make money of . Taking children away from the parents because they refuse the chemotherapy route is not ok , and it is all based on the ' studies ' .



  •  

Lady Smith

Perhaps I should have mentioned that I'm vegetarian because I have dietary issues and intolerances with eating a 'normal' omnivorous diet.  In my particular case there was a definite improvement in wellness and well being after becoming a vegetarian which made a big difference to my quality of life.  As always your experience may vary.
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Lady Smith on August 09, 2015, 03:05:17 AM
Perhaps I should have mentioned that I'm vegetarian because I have dietary issues and intolerances with eating a 'normal' omnivorous diet.  In my particular case there was a definite improvement in wellness and well being after becoming a vegetarian which made a big difference to my quality of life.  As always your experience may vary.

Indeed and also , as i said , i really don't try to change anyone . I am not an activist , i don't intend to live for long and i only want to enjoy the little life that remained . I don't have family or friends , i don't really care for nothing , so there is no cause for me , only my opinions .


  •  

Serverlan

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 09, 2015, 12:41:33 AM
Cholesterol is bad, saturated fats are bad

Some cholesterol is bad (LDL), some good (HDL). There's still some disagreement about saturated fats, with researchers advising that people err on the side of caution regarding their consumption.

QuoteBreastfeeding is bad

Outside of special circumstances, I've never heard a peer-reviewed medical scientist make this claim. If you know of any, I'd be genuinely interested in reading them.

QuoteSmoking is good

Prior to 1964 nobody had any data to suggest smoking was either good or bad for your health. After that, science stepped in and said "Don't smoke!" (I know, it's Yul Brynner's line, but it sums up the Surgeon General's message so well).

QuoteMercury to treat sexual diseases

First used around 1495 and it killed people as a result. Funnily enough, doctors subsequently advised against its use.

QuoteHeroin as a treatment

Not sure what you mean here, as it's still used today under the name Diamorphine.

QuoteEat trans fats

Again, not sure who has ever advised that it's good to eat foods containing trans fatty acids. They have been used in food, yes, but that has nothing to do with scientific research advocating that food companies should do so. In fact, as early as 1956, scientific literature suggested that trans fatty acids could be linked to coronary artery disease.

QuoteForced caesarean

This is not about science per se, but rather about the rights of a patient versus the authority of the medical profession and judiciary. I don't think anyone disputes the fact that there is a significant health risk for women who want to give birth naturally after giving multiple caesarean births.

You see, it's not science that tells us what to eat; people who interpret and apply science do that (yes, "big pharma" and "big food", if you want to call it that). Science just shows us what is more or less likely to occur through a process of systematic, repeatable observation and experimentation. Science isn't telling you what to put on your cereal, people who are not scientists are telling you that. People who own huge corporations, the media, or your friend down the road who stopped drinking soy milk because it gave them a rash which may or may not have been linked to the soy milk, but hey, it seems that's what was causing it, even though it takes health specialists months or even years to pin down the single variable responsible for a particular allergy ... *breathes*...

So, in regards to science versus anecdotal evidence, I tend to err on the side of caution and maintain a healthy scepticism about both – though science is infinitely more convincing. You know, peer-reviewed science, not sourced from sensationalist media publications, conspiracy theorist nuts, or ideologically motivated individuals. And yes, I get that some peer-reviewed research is completely wrong. But the fact that it's peer-reviewed, read by other experts, means that this incorrect data can be corrected.

As for your views on child vaccination and homeopathy, I'll take it you included them as some kind of joke.
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Serverlan on August 09, 2015, 04:56:09 AM
Some cholesterol is bad (LDL), some good (HDL). There's still some disagreement about saturated fats, with researchers advising that people err on the side of caution regarding their consumption.

Outside of special circumstances, I've never heard a peer-reviewed medical scientist make this claim. If you know of any, I'd be genuinely interested in reading them.

Prior to 1964 nobody had any data to suggest smoking was either good or bad for your health. After that, science stepped in and said "Don't smoke!" (I know, it's Yul Brynner's line, but it sums up the Surgeon General's message so well).

First used around 1495 and it killed people as a result. Funnily enough, doctors subsequently advised against its use.

Not sure what you mean here, as it's still used today under the name Diamorphine.

Again, not sure who has ever advised that it's good to eat foods containing trans fatty acids. They have been used in food, yes, but that has nothing to do with scientific research advocating that food companies should do so. In fact, as early as 1956, scientific literature suggested that trans fatty acids could be linked to coronary artery disease.

This is not about science per se, but rather about the rights of a patient versus the authority of the medical profession and judiciary. I don't think anyone disputes the fact that there is a significant health risk for women who want to give birth naturally after giving multiple caesarean births.

You see, it's not science that tells us what to eat; people who interpret and apply science do that (yes, "big pharma" and "big food", if you want to call it that). Science just shows us what is more or less likely to occur through a process of systematic, repeatable observation and experimentation. Science isn't telling you what to put on your cereal, people who are not scientists are telling you that. People who own huge corporations, the media, or your friend down the road who stopped drinking soy milk because it gave them a rash which may or may not have been linked to the soy milk, but hey, it seems that's what was causing it, even though it takes health specialists months or even years to pin down the single variable responsible for a particular allergy ... *breathes*...

So, in regards to science versus anecdotal evidence, I tend to err on the side of caution and maintain a healthy scepticism about both – though science is infinitely more convincing. You know, peer-reviewed science, not sourced from sensationalist media publications, conspiracy theorist nuts, or ideologically motivated individuals. And yes, I get that some peer-reviewed research is completely wrong. But the fact that it's peer-reviewed, read by other experts, means that this incorrect data can be corrected.

As for your views on child vaccination and homeopathy, I'll take it you included them as some kind of joke.

The cholesterol in ourn body was named good or bad , but eating things high in cholesterol and also finding  high levels are not related with disease .
Saturated fats were blamed publicily . Think of all the people who get scared when they hear a person is eating butter , who made them think so ?
Now i am, at work and can't find the time to post all the pics and sources , but in will some day .
Doctors used to recommend smoking , also i will post the datas . Beside even the cyclits used to smoke thinking it helps with vascular dilation and more stamina :/

It is not about the risks of birth , it's about women being put under and woke up with the child being brought by caesarian . That without asking for consent first .

It is not about science as an independent thing , it is about the medical community and other people with influence imposing the things found through science .


And yes , vaccines are a just harming children and should be used only in some cases where they really worth the damage they do .
But again , i am not doing activism , i don't even care , i didn't have mine done since i could chose , i wouldn't vaccinate my children and that's that .
People are easier to fool than to agree that they were fooled . They heard vaccines save lives , they believed it , now it will take ages to show that the things are not black nor white , it's a delicate situation that should be approached with an open mind and in a special way for every special case .


  •  

Serverlan

Quote from: Claudia_FF on August 09, 2015, 05:11:12 AM
It is not about science... it is about the medical community and other people with influence imposing the things found through science.


Yes, that's what I was arguing. On the other hand, you were arguing that "scientists have it wrong" and you "don't trust studies". But if "other people" (the media, politicians, lobby groups, etc.) choose to incorrectly interpret and exploit peer-reviewed scientific studies, it does not mean we should abandon the scientific method altogether.
  •  

Laura_7

Quote from: Serverlan on August 08, 2015, 11:33:17 PM
Not necessarily a solid case for vegetarianism, but research has shown for quite a while now that caloric restrictions extend life. More related to vegetarianism perhaps, is a later study that shows how life expectancy enjoyed by those restricting calorie intake can be replicated by way of a high-carb/low-protein diet. There is of course some associated debate regarding the type and quality of carbs and proteins that we should be consuming, the ratio of carbs to protein and whether it's better to have fasting days -- and the ratio of fast vs meal days -- or to have a more consistent calorie restriction diet.
You could look up intermediate fasting.
There is one way for example where you only eat in the evening. Or simply at one time a day.
  •  

ClaudiaLove

Quote from: Serverlan on August 09, 2015, 05:28:25 AM
Yes, that's what I was arguing. On the other hand, you were arguing that "scientists have it wrong" and you "don't trust studies". But if "other people" (the media, politicians, lobby groups, etc.) choose to incorrectly interpret and exploit peer-reviewed scientific studies, it does not mean we should abandon the scientific method altogether.

They are not really needed either . It's like reinventing the wheel . Nutrition is nutrition , just eat and live .


  •