If you want available surgeons to be able to do the surgery, two letters helps absolve them and those who wrote the letters after evaluating. Otherwise, malpractice premiums would rise for the surgeons who will perform the surgery and the cost of the increase would inevitably raise the price of GRS and lower availability of surgeons willing.
Informed consent is best used when the effects are gradual over time, hence why many places accept it for HRT. Surgery requirements are there because of the Hippocratic oath, since they aren't reversible. Basic routinely performed cosmetic procedures always involve consultations to weed out bad candidates, and have so many available surgeons that if someone wants the surgery enough they can nearly always find someone despite any ethical issues involved.
Yes there should be reform. Yes we in our community should be able to address complaints to a guiding body about incompetence or disingenuous behavior from Gatekeepers. Yes there needs to be advancement and increased availability and insurance coverage for transition surgeries including top and bottom surgeries, FFS, and FMS. There's a mountain of change that is needed, but in our current system with the current selection of surgeries, opening them all to informed consent will break the rickety piecemeal system we've cobbled together in spite of violence and bigotry. I would hate to see transition surgeries performed in clinics treated similarly to ones that provide abortive procedures.
Hugs,
- Katie
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk