Quote from: SadieBlake on August 15, 2016, 06:44:34 AM
All that said, you mentioned revealed religion and transcendence. My one solid point of departure with Judeo-Christian and the words of Islam are that they all AFAIK share this one true God idea and go on to say that those who never receive the word of God are denied heaven. . . .
So my own belief is that the spark of life, spirit or soul if you prefer is everywhere.
This touches the heart of where I am right now and where I think I'm headed.
Back when I was a Mormon I believed as they believe. Then when I was a fundamentalist I again believed as they believe. The same when I was an Anglo-Catholic. The reason I kept moving around is because my mind is intensely curious and drives me to learn as much as I can about things I become interested in. So, while it's easy to believe anything at first without close examination, a little thought and study soon reveals where all the gaping holes are. In my mind if God is truth and a theology is full of holes, then that theology is not of God.
So, about ten years ago my thinking began to evolve and I began to adopt some Gnostic ideas. I would not call myself a Gnostic since that name today has some added on connotations that aren't really related to what Christian Gnosticism was in the early Church. And even that early Gnosticism remains largely unknown as most of their writing was destroyed and their teaching suppressed.
If there is a God who is the primal Spirit and who is the source of all light then I think it is correct to say that there is only one true God. However, the Gnostics would say that he is ineffable. Man likes to over define things though and the result is doctrines that limit God to specific locations on earth at specific points in history. I do not accept that.
I do however accept Jesus as the Logos of God, one who is a direct emanation of the ineffable God. What does that mean? I think it's something we do not fully understand so call this the Trinity, or come up with another way of describing it. I don't think our doctrinal definitions are particularly important.
As the Logos of God, Jesus reveals the ineffable one and teaches us how to align ourselves with him. The Gnostics would call that uniting the light of our Spirits with the eternal light which is God.
Nothing in my reading of the Gospel of John or John's letters contradicts that interpretation. I can align it with the rest of the scriptures too, if they are not taken all as literal history.
I know this makes me a heretic to contemporary Christianity. That doesn't really concern me though. The main thing is that we reflect the all encompassing love of God as Jesus taught. That isn't by following a list of rules, but it isn't license for unconstrained conduct either. Any act must be evaluated by the standard of God's light reflected in our Spirit. The Christian word for this I think is being filled with the Holy Spirit. God's light can best be described as perfect, unselfish, and infinite love. So, it seems to me that if one has this light inside them they would just automatically know some things are wrong. Adultery for instance, or murder, or hatred, or enmity. Does it harm someone and is it selfish rather than giving.
Actually, nothing I said there is in any way contrary even to Paul's epistles. However, the Church from an early time, while saying they believed this, felt they needed to add a bunch of written rules on top of it. The Reformers added even more rules. Even Paul did this. Jesus however did not.
To me this makes all makes sense because it doesn't lock God's revelation into a specific period of history or geographic area. Taking everything literally does that and makes it all look very stupid to outsiders. Those are not even my words but the words of St. Augustine 1600 years ago in his book, "The City of God."
As for those whose circumstances are such that they do not know Christianity, I think it is a perversion of God to categorically state that they are all damned. It totally negates the idea of a primal and universal God and reduces him back to the status of the tribal War God of Israel. It's not even necessary to believe this to remain within the bounds of Christianity. As Paul stated,
Rom 2:14-16, "When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus." (RSV2CE)
As for all these others we are not called to judge anyway. Rather we are called to love our neighbor as we love ourselves. Matt 19:19. Much of modern Christianity seems to have lost touch with what Jesus taught, preferring the model of their own tribal War God instead.
Anyway, this is where my thinking has evolved to right now. From whatever I can deduce from what I believe God has revealed to me I think I am on the right track.