Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Is God A Myth?

Started by Teri Anne, January 08, 2006, 09:58:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kimberly

Quote from: Chaunte on January 10, 2006, 09:41:37 PM... Organized religions allow people to come together to share stories within an agreed-upon framework. ...

Yes, but that, I feel, is a very good reason to run far from such things.

Preconceived notions are BAD when you are dealing with the unknown.

I imagine someone will ponder about 'God not being an unknown', but consider that you only know what you perceive and technically speaking you can't even be sure of that. Everything could be SO totally different than we think it is and we would not know. There could be no God in Heaven, no Sun in our solar system and so on. All of the events we find unexplainable can be explained in multiple ways. In essence anything you want to cite as proof isn't. (Because you can't be sure that what you cite actually is what you think it is.)

Go on, prove we're not on a Holodeck... or part of the 'Matrix' (gah what a confused move that lot was), or that we are just the dream of an intergalactic whale... So on and so forth.

I am a firm believer of giving credit where credit is due, and I'm afraid humans continually sell themselves short. I know there is something else out there, but I don't think it is what is defying the odds.
  •  

Terri-Gene

QuoteTerri and I are of native American ancestory.

Yeah but somehow we ended up growing up exposed to Anglo culture. unavoidable I guess, but thats ok, the Anglo culture needs a few blood thirsty woman warriors in fhier mdst, just to keep them aquainted with reality concerning the "weaker" sex and thier dispostion with being considered inferior, on any grounds.

Terri
  •  

Celia

I suppose if you asked me twice, I'd give two different answers, but here goes.  I regard God as being inherent in the way I view the world.  I subscribe to such quaint notions as truth and reality.  Some folks don't, opting for a basic view of the world as a brainfart of cosmic dimensions, some ludicrous, random moshpit of severed heads and burning garbage.  Not exactly my cup of tea, but it seems to get 'em through the day. ;D

If you want to see what sort of other answer I might give on a different occasion, try the following thread: https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,81.0.html :)

-Celia
Only the young die young.
  •  

Teri Anne

#23
Dear all,
Thank you for all of your observations...

JAMES - Thank you for offering that you and your group question God and feel it's important to do so -- that it's part of being a good Christian.

LEIGH - Yes, the Catholics certainly have been doing a bad job of dealing with the pedophelia.  I think the most blatantly wrong thing they did was blame it on "homosexuality" rather than pedaphelia.  It's blaming the wrong group--who'd have thunk they could have done that with a straight face?  Thanks for offering that Terri and you are of American Indian ancestry.  Interesting!

DENNIS - I love the idea of the American Indian "berdaches" tho prefer the name "two spirits" - it sounds so poetic and wonderful and turns the angst and negativity into something so beautiful.

JESSICA - "Apatheist" - interesting.  I hadn't heard that term before.  Thanks!

VERY KNAWTY - I checked into the links that you mentioned.  Wow.  I pasted them into a permanent file I keep of what I feel are profound or insightful things.  I especially liked the talk on what purpose we have on earth - it stated that trees don't ponder such things - it's somehow liberating to stop pondering every now and then.  Thank you.

JESSICA - If only some self-professed Christians were as good as you are.

CHAUNTE - It's interesting that you're a science teacher and also have a strong belief in God.  Yes, I'd heard that Albert Einstein believed in God, also.  It's one thing that makes me STOP and think that, if he believed in it, then maybe there's something to this religion thing.  His belief is worth more to me than books of ancient writings. 

KIMBERLY - You and I agree that, just because society agrees on something, doesn't necessarily make it so.

TERRI - "Blood-thirsty women warriers?'  Lol - and here I thought the two-spirited people were just peaceful people who could mediate between different factions.

CELIA - That God is inherent in the world seems, to me, the opposite of "truth and reality."  I don't dispute that it may be so -- it's just that I'm not there yet.

MY (RELIGIOUS) BROTHER SENT ME HIS RESPONSE TO MY "SPIRITURAL JOURNEY" DISCUSSION.  HOPEFULLY, IT'LL BE OF INTEREST.  I ASKED HIM IF IT'D BE OKAY TO POST IT HERE AND HE SAID THAT WOULD BE FINE.  HERE IS HIS REPONSE, PASTED BELOW:

Hi Teri Anne,

I very much appreciate all the thought that went into your and other people's notes.  A lot of excellent questions were raised, and I found it very interesting to hear what other people who are not plugged into mainline Christian denominations are thinking.  It's great to start the New Year with such a healthy dialogue about such important matters. 

Your thoughts about your own spiritual journey (or quest?) are very interesting because I see many parallels with my own.  Though you probably wouldn't believe it, I too was quite a skeptic in my college days.  I hung around Christian people because their beliefs appealed to me.  But I kept telling them that I want to be convinced that it's true and not just wishful thinking. 

You mentioned that the most horrific movie you ever saw was "The Exorcist", and that you find that the existence of evil spirits is even more plausible than a belief in God.  I can distinctly remember walking on Corona del Mar beach at about 10 pm with a friend telling me all of his experiences with the occult.  Some of the stuff he told me sent shivers up my spine.  I've also heard that some very weird stuff happened during the filming of that movie, like sets collapsing and people dying.  It's almost like an evil spirit didn't want that film to be made.  I can't vouch for the accuracy of these reports, but they are not implausible. 

I very much believe that the existence of a devil very much explains the suffering in this world.  But I don't talk about it much because many people seem to think the devil is nothing but a joke.  I also believe the devil has been working overtime infecting a lot of the mainline churches, since his highest priority is to tear down religious people.  So, I wouldn't take too seriously the televangelist who called transgendered people "butchers of their own bodies".  I attribute a lot of the sick terrorism in the Muslin faith to the demonic too. 

You said a couple of times that, when you try to reach out to God, nothing happens.  I must admit that the two most dramatic answers to prayer I've had were my very first two.  I was a senior at U.C. Irvine wondering what life would bring after I graduated, and very worried about being drafted in the middle of the Vietnam war and not being able to get into grad school.   The morning that I arrived on a bus at the LA Induction Center for my Army physical, a strange peace overcame me as I looked out of the bus window at a beautiful sunrise.  By the end of the day I was classified 4-F.  Within a few days, I was accepted at the University of Toronto with financial aid, an added bonus I wasn't expecting. 

For some reason, my answers to prayer since then have not been so immediate or so obvious.  I still get that sense of peace from time to time, but a skeptic could easily explain that as psychological.  I certainly don't hear Him talking to me, as one of your responders named "Cassandra" said.  Not to doubt what she says, but my experience has not been that direct.  But, I've thought over the years, if my prayers were so immediately answered as my first two, God would become my "Cosmic Bellhop".  It's God who is calling the shots, and sometimes He answers right away, and other times He answers years and years later.  One much delayed answer was my prayer about getting married.  I remember one time getting so frustrated that I said to God: "Okay, I don't know if you're ever going to answer this one.  But I've decided that, like Job, I'm not going to renounce my faith over this".  Of course, by then I had completed seminary and had a very strong intellectual foundation for my faith.  Well, soon after that prayer, Wanda came along, and in retrospect, I realize that waiting to work out my issues has made our marriage much stronger. 

In any case, I've come to believe that anyone who believes that our contact with God is always very real underestimates how separated this world is from God.  Even the great Christian writer C.S. Lewis said, in his book A Grief Observed, that after his wife died, he tried to pray to God, but was confronted with "a door shut, and double bolted from the inside". 

After my prayer about getting into grad school, I was in Canada riding on a bus to a missionary conference.  It was snowing very hard and the busses were kind of going in a caravan.  In the seat behind me was a very joyful young woman who was engaged to be married.  When we reached our destination, we received some very somber news.  One of the busses (apparently behind us) had gotten into an accident.  This joyful woman's fiancé was killed.  But what absolutely appalled me was how people around me, including this woman, were saying it was God's will and that this fiancé is much better off in Heaven. 

That really bothered me for quite a while, but I guess I came to realize that these people believed this stuff much more than I did.  So, I went on the reading spree, trying to get my hands on every book I could about why Christians believe what they believe.  I found it all very interesting, but not convincing.  I'd dialogue about this with my housemates (who were all Christians) practically every night over dinner, asking them many of the questions you are asking.  One of them did say something to me that stuck.  He said, when evaluating the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, we have to be very aware of our presuppositions   Many of us bring to that inquiry the presupposition that miracles are impossible.  So we're very likely to believe just about any explanation for the resurrection accounts other than that it really happened. 

Shortly thereafter I read C.S. Lewis' book called On Miracles, which convinced me that a disbelief in miracles comes from our Western naturalistic thinking that the universe is totally uniform, which can't be proven.  He also argued that, if the universe runs by very regular laws of cause and effect which are inviolable, then free will can't exist. 

But it all didn't come together for me until a couple of years later, after I'd returned to California.  One night I was watching a science show on TV with dad.  They went into some very complex stuff regarding Einstein's theory of relativity and atomic physics.  I was awed, and came away with a thought I hadn't had before.  The idea of a resurrection is no weirder that some of the things that scientists believe are true and have proven through scientific experiments.  Look at relatively: the faster you go, the slower time goes, and time would stop if you could move at the speed of light.  Isn't that bizarre?  Funny thing is I never said anything to dad about my thoughts because I didn't think he'd understand. 

So, as they say, the rest is history.  I will say that, from that walk on the Corona del Mar beach to watching that science show with dad, about six years elapsed.  So, the answers to these questions didn't come easy.  And some people never get there in this life.  What's going to happen to them?  Wanda and most Christian's I've spoken with don't agree with my view on this.  But I think God will give such people a second chance in Heaven if they've been searching, but have been distracted by all the devil's work here on earth.  I like to point out that no less a Christian than C.S. Lewis seemed to hold this view, and wrote a whole book about it called The Great Divorce.  I too am greatly troubled by the allegation that mom and dad might have gone to Hell.  But am comforted by the fact that, in the few conversations I had with dad about this towards the end of his life, he told me that he was not an atheist, just an agnostic.   He once said "there very well could be something out there". 

Is God going to zap us if we don't believe?  I don't think so.  And it's helpful to note that the Bible isn't talking about an intellectual belief, but more the desire to follow Him.  And it's not like He's being an egotistical despot for demanding that we follow Him.  Rather, He's the source of all life, and we are only derived beings.  For us to think that we can exist independently of Him on an eternal basis is like a vacuum cleaner that thinks it can get along without electricity.   

Again, thank you for your e-mail on this.  Sorry for the lengthy reply.  I haven't been able to address all the points that people made.  But there are two sermons I could send you, one on the resurrection and one on how we can believe stuff that happened long ago.  I also have one on intelligent design.  Let me know if you're interested in receiving any of these. 

I look forward to more dialogue.  May the Lord bless you in the New Year. 

Love
(my brother)
  •  

Wendy

Dear Terrie Anne,

Thanks for this interesting thread and your comments.

When I read your comments I seem to have portrayed a "fire and brimstone" message.  Actually I do not believe in "fire and brimstone" but I do believe living creatures have an energy that is more than the chemicals that comprise their bodies.  Humans also have the mind to decide what makes sense to them.

Ancient scholars that wrote the bible used analogies and images that made sense to the people receiving the messages.  Hell is simply a spiritual state in which one prefers to be without God.  It is not fire and brimstone.

I can relate to Casandra's comments of God speaking to me and working miracles.  You might believe miracles are just coincidences.

When my oldest daughter was young she had a cranial tumor removed.  She woke up with half her face paralyzed.  The surgeon and I both cried.  The surgeon had not touched those facial nerves and had not seen facial paralysis in all his surgeries.  When I asked him what we should do he said we should pray.  We did.  When my daughter woke up again she had no paralysis.  Maybe we explain things we do not understand with God?  Maybe God is amoung us?

I do not have an ability to hear God or sense God's presence.  However when I was 9 years old my granmother (Nana) said goodbye to me when I was awake and she was no where to be seen.   My grandmother was a very religious woman that had the gift of prophesy and was close to me.  I was very scared at what happened and told my mom that Nana was about to die.  My mom assured me Nana was fine.  Later that evening we got a call that Nana had died unexpectedly of a heart attack at 63 years old.

We certainly have a spirit and we can not see it.  In addition logic, science and probably tells me that humans are not the highest intellience in the universe.  Again I have not seen these terrestrial creatures.  Trying to be a little less serious I ask, "Is God an alien?"
  •  

Peggiann

Terrie Anne,

I have been reading this post regularly. I find this a very thought stimulating post. I for one would be interested your your brother's other sermons to read. Please forword him my email so he can email them to me.

peggiannspal@yahoo.com

Smiles,
Peggiann
  •  

Dennis

Teri-Anne, one thing I find difficult about your brother's acknowledgment of evil within the church (or whatever else you want to call it - discrimination, criminal conduct, etc), he then goes on the lay the blame on "the devil", rather than the church structure that encourages, ignores, or facilitates the activity in question. By that reasoning, a religion would never have to examine itself or its pretexts or its structures, because anything negative that flows therefrom is not the fault of the religion, but is blamed on anything external.

Dennis
  •  

rana

Teri,
This is such an interesting thread, I am glad you have started it & am impressed with what I am reading here. Just some comments thou
I am Catholic and while I agree (generally) with what has been said about pedophilia, it hurts to read about comments that seem to define it as a problem for the Catholic Church as though every other religion is not infected (and I am sure this includes wicca & what are considered non organisied religions)- we all know this is not the case, dont we? I believe that the Catholic Church IS tackleing the problem - Pope Benedicts actions against gay priests is only part of his initiatives (maybe he thinks that any action is better than none? he is wrong in this - and anyway the Catholic Church has no objection to gay people its the "lifestyle that is against doctrine).
I am glad you included that post from your brother, it strikes many chords with me, you get any more, please post them too.
Dennis I think that post of yours about the Devil being a convenient scapegoat for wrongs in church structures is unfair- I am sure that you will be able to quote particular examples but that won't prove your point overall.  Any structure of man is inherently flawed and no matter with what good intentions it is started with - evil will creep in, its part of the human condition & must always be struggled against.
One last thing about pedophilia, why is it considered such an abhorrant act by society, yet why do fashions for children seem to becoming more blatently sexual - and that there is no real outcry against this
  •  

Sarah Louise

I have been following this thread from the start and have avoided jumping in. 

I am a Christian, I accepted Christ when I was 30.  So, I don't have church doctrine drummed into my head and am able to think and read the Bible for myself.

I have been with two missionary organizations, I will leave the names out for a reason.  I saw one president and founder run out by the board and have seen many people "wounded" and driven into dispair by these groups, they have "many" problems.  But even with their problems and lies, God still seems to be able to reach the people these groups reach out to. 

The missionary groups and the church seem to be good at killing their wounded.

Organized Churches have many problems because they look more to their "Doctrine" than they do the Bible.

This does not negate my belief in God.

Sarah L.
Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •  

Dennis

QuoteDennis I think that post of yours about the Devil being a convenient scapegoat for wrongs in church structures is unfair- I am sure that you will be able to quote particular examples but that won't prove your point overall.

It's not actually a point to prove. It's a fallacy in argument that I pointed out. The irrefutable premise. If you come up with a premise like, "Religion is good because it's about God" and counter any example to the contrary with "that's not God doing that, it's the Devil", then it's not a very convincing premise.

It's a species of the logical fallacy called "begging the question", where the truth of the conclusion follows from the truth of the premises because it is contained in the premises.

Dennis
  •  

Leigh

Quote from: rana on January 17, 2006, 06:00:40 PM
Teri,

I am Catholic and while I agree (generally) with what has been said about pedophilia, it hurts to read about comments that seem to define it as a problem for the Catholic Church as though every other religion is not infected (and I am sure this includes wicca & what are considered non organisied religions)- we all know this is not the case, dont we?

I will agree that it happens in every religion or worship process.  However, I have never seen any publiction of this happening as many times by as many "reperesentatives of god" as with the Catholic church.  Combine that with the church actively working to hide the numbers of times this has happened, the attempts to declare bankruptcy to avoid payments of lawsuits, saying the assets of this diocese are seperate from that one--all of this leads me to believe the church itself is as guility as the individuals who committed the crime.

Quoteand anyway the Catholic Church has no objection to gay people its the "lifestyle that is against doctrine).

Oh, its ok to be gay just don't love someone physically?  How can someone be catholic if they do not practice the tenents of the church?
Quote
One last thing about pedophilia, why is it considered such an abhorrant act by society, yet why do fashions for children seem to becoming more blatently sexual - and that there is no real outcry against this.

why is it considered such an abhorrant act


You've never been molested have you?

Clothing has nothing to do with rape.  To believe so is a fallacy. 

Leigh
  •  

stephanie_craxford

Quote from: ranaOne last thing about pedophilia, why is it considered such an abhorrant act by society, yet why do fashions for children seem to becoming more blatently sexual - and that there is no real outcry against this

Just to state my position... I don't not believe in a god, supreme being, mystical force, or whatever, but I do have a view on the above quote.   Fashion has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia and to use that as an excuse is itself inexcusable, and even abhorrent.  Generally speaking parents govern what their children wear in the pre-teen years and I'm pretty sure that they are not trying to invite some pervert to molest their children when they decide what they will wear to school.  To even suggest that fashion has anything to do with this is to say that the child was asking for it because of the way they were dressed.  Total BS

Enough of that.  There is absolutely "NO" excuse for pedophilia, period, so don't try.

Just my thoughts.

Steph
  •  

Dennis

I think, to be fair, that Rana's statement was meant to be an expression of disapproval for children's fashions rather than an approval of pedophilia.

On a lighter note, a friend of mine is a principal at an elementary school. A teacher brought one of the grade six girls into her office because she was dressed in extremely skimpy clothes. My friend was trying to explain why you don't wear clothes like that at school and she said "look at me and Mrs. White, you wouldn't see us wearing an outfit like that at school, would you?". The girl looked at her in horror and said "Yes, but.....you're old."

Dennis
  •  

Shelley

I agree Dennis that Rana did not appear to be condoning in anyway pedophilia but the two subjects are mutually exclusive and as such really should not be raised together.

I agree totally with Steph that fashion has nothing to do with pedophilia as there should be an ingrained reaction against pedophelia and for those who have not been ingrained there is never any possible excuse.

To continue on your lighter not however Dennis, unfortunately age does not prevent some from wearing fashions to young for them :)

Shelley
  •  

rana

I guess this thread only goes to prove "Barrack Rules"  discussions re religion & politics should be banned as they always lead to trouble.  This is a pity as there can be really interesting discussions on them
Teri, up to now I have enjoyed this thread & was glad you posted it. But all I feel now is deep anger. People are entitled to their own opinions but after a while if feels like they are rubbing their take on things in other peoples faces (mine).
Leigh your post is aggressive & confrontational - Obviously you dont like the Catholic Church and are happy to go on about it - even thou what you are saying does not correspond to my reality. 
You know nothing about me - how do you know I havent been molested as a child. To make a statement like that in such circumstances is a truely insensitive act - and you rabbiting on about the insensitivity of men earlier.
Did your really think I was excusing rape by blaming it on the victims clothing.
Stephanie did you really think I was in any way condoning pedophelia - making excuses for it???
Dennis, obviously you are a lawyer- yes you were spot on, you would demolish me in any argument without a doubt - but still I think your statement was unfair.
I think I may give this topic a miss - my hide is getting too easily peirced these days :(
  •  

DawnL

Quote from: Leigh on January 17, 2006, 08:48:03 PM
Clothing has nothing to do with rape. 

Dead on.  There is an issue here though and clothing is at the edge of it.  While clothing has nothing to do with rape or the sexual abuse of children, it is perhaps a symbol of a deeper problem in western society, the sexual objectification of women and young girls.  We are so immersed in this in-your-face sexism that we no longer seem to notice that ads frequently show scantily clad women next to fully dressed men.  Women and young girls are seen as objects of desire, body parts to be exploited, not living breathing feeling individuals.  Do you think they'll ever make movie about three guys in Speedos called Charlene's Angels?  I rather doubt it. 

I didn't read any implication into Rana's post but this is an issue that should be handled very carefully since the argument of clothing has been used by too many rapists (one is too many) as an excuse for their violent behaviour.

Dawn
  •  

Dennis

Rana, I will temper what I said with the statement that I think religion is a matter of faith, not logic. As is belief in God.

Nothing negative about believing in a god or having a religion, I just get irked when people try to logically justify it. It's faith, not logic. You believe or you don't. Same with any spiritual aspect. A little like beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder. You can't try and logically convince someone that something or someone is beautiful.

Dennis
  •  

Leigh

Rana

If there was anything I posted about the churches stance on priests, pedophillia and hiding their assets that was wrong I will apologise in the largest font avaiable.

You are correct.  I know nothing of you or your life situations, past or present.  The way you stated the question about society and clothing is why I posted my inquiry in the form I did.

Leigh

  •  

stephanie_craxford

Quote from: RanaStephanie did you really think I was in any way condoning pedophilia - making excuses for it???

Rana, I was in no way insinuating that you approved/condoned pedophilia.  My post was not directed at you but referred to the statement itself on clothing.  I re-read my reply, and i could see where you may have thought it was directed at you.  It wasn't.

I'm sorry if you took my reply that way, it was not intended, and I apologize if I caused you any hurt.

Steph
  •  

Celia

My, this thread has run off on an unpleasant tangent. :eusa_eh:  Pedophilia is an appalling phenomenon.  Is there any serious debate about this?  No one here is calling anyone else a pedophile.  Agreed?  Arguments about deviant inclinations and behavior are far off topic for this thread.  Shall we put this train back on its track? ::)

-Celia

Only the young die young.
  •