Anyone use the Emisil 2nd Gen STP?

[FreakOfNature]

I really like the variation of detailing on it but I just wished it wasn't so big. I've read some reviews on Tumblr but there isn't enough through reviews as I would like.  I cannot really tell if it hangs naturally like the Reelmagik STP from looking at the photos if it was to be adhered to the body.  I know there is the need to practice with all STPs but my biggest priority is a tool that looks like it should AND the natural placement of it so I am wondering how close this comes to Reelmagik...

I was also concerned about the weight of this so I asked them and its apparently 270-280 grams which is 9.5 oz+ so that's good at least but then there is the size.  I just don't want it sticking out abnormally but since its hollow maybe it squish and wont?

[Nathan90]

I only have experience with the first gen. But just wanted to say that you should email Emisil and ask for a smaller model. They told me they were making a smaller stp as a Gen2 but in the end they told me 'everybody' is asking for a bígger one. So they changed their plans.

So if more guys ask about a smaller one they might go for it in the future.

[RaptorChops]

I plan on getting the Gen 2 at some point when I get some money. I love the EZP but most of my underwear aren't very snug so it's a annoying when it moves around a lot. Plus I feel like the Gen 2 looks much more realistic.

[maxman]

I'm also very curious about the 'hang' in relation to the reelmagik. I have tested both reelmagik stp and emisil gen 1, and prefer the reelmagik due to the realistic hang/bulge. Emisil is planning on getting me a test model of the new gen 2 when they have a chance, I'm eager to see how it fits/moves.

[RaptorChops]

I'm also very curious about the 'hang' in relation to the reelmagik. I have tested both reelmagik stp and emisil gen 1, and prefer the reelmagik due to the realistic hang/bulge. Emisil is planning on getting me a test model of the new gen 2 when they have a chance, I'm eager to see how it fits/moves.

From the pictures I've seen it seems to have the same kind of hang but it's much bigger than the RM. I really like the size of the RM but I'm not a fan of the way the funnel looks. I might just hold on to my money until something different and thinner comes out from Emisil.

[steel86man]

I have one, and I don't know if it's due to its weight or because of the adhesive I'm using but I can't get it to adhere.  As far as STP it is better than some of the cheaper products out there.  My only problem is that I'm a bigger guy so it's still not working well as an STP option which sucks since I forked over all my change for the thing. It looks quite realistic although I can't compare it to much else packer wise. I would say although it's flaccid, the balls seem to get in the way and so it doesn't look as flaccid as it could. I typically pack it with my rodeoH briefs and it's not noticeable.

All in all, I must say I purchased it for the sole intention of using it as a realistic STP. I cannot do that and so I've gone back to my RM basic packer.

[Superrad]

I purchased it and honestly, I love it.

It doesn't squish for me and I tend to use it for pack and play. For STP without trousers it works perfectly. It's so easy and natural... but with them I am not perfect. Since I'm almost never willing to wet myself, I just use a stall. Still, I don't doubt that it would work just fine.

Aesthetics are good. Was discussing this with my boyfriend today. He thought it was cut but I pointed out that it looked like the foreskin was pulled back so the middle is a bit thicker than the rest. I don't think it's heavy and although I never really packed much before, I thought it was very easy to get used to and comfortable. I was also worried it would be too big--I'm 5"5 but it's not looked obscene or too noticeable.

Overall I am pleased as punch with the product. My boyfriend goes on about how realistic it is... but the wait time was more than x2 what the website suggested for me.
Can't say anything about the adhesion aspect though, sorry!

[maxman]

I have one, and I don't know if it's due to its weight or because of the adhesive I'm using but I can't get it to adhere.  As far as STP it is better than some of the cheaper products out there.  My only problem is that I'm a bigger guy so it's still not working well as an STP option which sucks since I forked over all my change for the thing. It looks quite realistic although I can't compare it to much else packer wise. I would say although it's flaccid, the balls seem to get in the way and so it doesn't look as flaccid as it could. I typically pack it with my rodeoH briefs and it's not noticeable.

All in all, I must say I purchased it for the sole intention of using it as a realistic STP. I cannot do that and so I've gone back to my RM basic packer.

I've never been able to adhere anything... Maybe it's my skin? Not sure, but I've never had luck adhering any product.

[StirfriedKraut]

Interesting.

I hadn't heard of this company (or maybe I did and had since forgot).

I've been meaning to try and find an adherable funnel STP to mod to my needs. Kind of curious as to what the balls are like on these Emisils though. The main reason I'm looking to more expensive models now is that I'm tired of having very stiffly constructed balls. Also, what currency is the price on the site in?