A huff post writer suggested that we needed to be more empathetic as the social ground has shifted for so many
people:
Could the Transgender Bathroom Debacle Have Been Avoided?[/b]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-deutsch/could-the-transgender-bat_b_9963072.htmlThe Huffington Post/by Jon Deutsch 05/13/2016 07:23 pm ET | Updated 21 hours ago
On one hand i agree people need to be loving and empathetic in all interactions with people including those fearful of change, but i am also trying to understand why he did not suggest anything? What exactly have we done wrong post marriage equality?
We pretty much have a wide understanding that this is a poorly veiled attempt on the right's part but again, I'm not sure what should have been done different.
So being a curious person i rang up a very conservative friend and i think a member of the AFA, which has been designated a hate group by the southern poverty law center. ( at least he donates i know)
His responses did not help me a lot but i guess shed some light on it. He said that there was a feeling that " the LGTB" lobby and liberal allies had lorded it over them and that they were "thumbing their noses" at traditional culture that many of them loved deeply. He specifically said seeing the white house lit up in rainbow lighting really hurt. He said that it felt like acceptance of the new was rejecting that traditional and making them feel like they were out of place etc.
(I'm paraphrasing)
..then he launched into some pseudoscientific data about how traditional values and a less diverse society actually made a nation stronger and that "effeminate men " would not defend the country and that some races are proven genetically to have a lower IQ etc. (incredible i kid you not ) and finally he began to lose me, so i thanked him for the discussion and went on my way.
So what do you think? Do you think his views are widely held in that group of folks?