Susan's Place Logo
Main Menu

Symbolism or Substance in ENDA Debate? {Opinion/Editorial by Jody M Huckaby}

Started by Lisbeth, October 25, 2007, 10:03:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lisbeth

Wednesday Oct 24, 2007, Edge San Francisco

When the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) received its first-ever vote in the House of Representatives and passed the Education and Labor Committee on Oct. 18, it should have been a historic - and celebratory - moment for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. But there was a cloud hanging over the vote, with over 300 LGBT and allied groups in the United ENDA Coalition advocating for the original form of the bill introduced earlier this year- one that finally included a ban on discrimination based on gender identity. The House Democratic leadership's decision to strip those protections from the bill, leaving only sexual orientation covered, has turned what should have been a victory into an unnecessarily divisive, disappointing setback for the LGBT movement.

More... 🔗 [Link: edgesanfrancisco.com/index.php/]
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html 🔗
  •