I do know that Brassard offers free revisions for the first year. He already prioritizes appearance over depth; he gives most women 5.5-6" of depth and uses any extra tissue for better aesthetics (this is one reason I liked him, because I wanted adequate depth but didn't care about more than that). And he uses scrotal skin for the labia; the inner portion of the labia minora is lined from the excess urethra, which is as close as penile skin gets to the labia. (I'm OK with that too; the results of that urethral tissue are lovely and mucosal on me.) This is actually fairly anatomically correct - the tissue that differentiates into the scrotum in utero is what will form the labia majora instead in baby girls. Oh, and I was orgasmic within 3 weeks, but there's no way for any doctor to guarantee that.
Personally, I wish I'd asked for more pictures (just to get a sense of what my own bits would look like!) and for his actual complications rate - he did say he's had only 2 fistulas, and he does hundreds of operations a year, but obviously there are other things that can go wrong.
