Quote from: AnonyMs on October 15, 2016, 11:45:03 PM
What do you think of the results on Dr Bowers site?
This is about Suporn, perhaps its of interest
https://www.the-ress.net/files/SRS-With-Dr-Suporn-2015.pdf
Hi again AnonyMs. I'm glad you responded. I had something to show too.
First, though, I'm very flattered that you want to hear my opinion on Dr. Bowers's patient's SRS results, so thank you for that! Okay, so I checked them out for you, and here's my thoughts:
Of the 21 SRS pictures she has posted on her website, my favorites were 2, 15, and 16 (15 and 16 being of the same person). In terms of the way it is constructed, the result depicted in Picture 2 looks exactly like every cis vagina I have seen, and I prefer it even over Danielle's! The vagina of the girl in Picture 2 does not appear to have a dilation hole under the lower lips of her vagina (if she did, it seems it would make her vagina have the black "U" line I have been mentioning in previous responses); it seems to be burying the dilation hole between the upper and lower lips, which is what I like!
Now onto Pictures 15 and 16: These show a result that looks unlike any other post op result (aside from how Kimber James's vagina looks in some pictures) and cis vagina I have ever seen. Basically, the vagina depicted in Pictures 15 and 16 just looks like a dilation hole (to me, at least). And though I have been saying things like "I like the vaginas that have lower lips that extend to where the dilation hole is in between both the upper and lower lips," my original preference (that might even end up being my final preference) was the way Kimber James's vagina looks in some pictures, where the vagina consists of just a dilation hole and nothing more. The concept just looks "cool" to me, lol.
And as far as the other vaginas, they are not my taste (again, my taste is for vaginas to look as cis as possible or maybe even where they just look like a hole) because they are either too hairy to give a good opinion, or too scrunched up (somehow this makes them look like they are going to pop! [The girls could just be swollen still, though.]), or too swollen, or have material in the way, or they have a hole that, while not a black "U" line, still is either an "O" hole or just a hole that is right under the lower vagina lips (Pictures 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 18, 21 being representative of those sorts of holes). (The first picture even has a black "V" line that does not even seem to be connected to the open lips above it. Picture 12 looks like the girl is going to have results like Picture 2. The grey gunk on her lower lips makes it hard to determine that, though.)
[And note: If anyone who reads this is looking to attack me again because of having seen a bajillion cis vaginas and thinking that all cis vaginas look different from one another, you should know that when I said "as cis as possible," I'm going by the cis vaginas *I* have seen. Telling me "All cis vaginas look different" doesn't make sense because it's not up to you to make my eyes see certain things as being different and other things as being not different. Some post op results (the "thai" type for instance) lack some basic features I have seen in every cis vagina *I* have seen, and there is nothing you or anyone can say to take away this experience of what I'm seeing. I'm not the Devil for noticing something. I'm getting tired again; I hope I'm being clear.])
And AnonyMs, I was glad you responded because I found a recent Suporn result last night that looks much more "in accordance to my taste" than the results he has on his website. I was very happy to see it. Does Susan's Place allow posting of links to graphic pictures, though? If not, I can try to explain how to get there.
Oh and thank you for the PDF file! I have it now, I'm going to save it just in case I need it. I'm very happy that it's long, lol.
As usual, if anyone has anything else to add, please post. And if you now hate me because of the "cis vagina vs certain trans vaginas" thing I've been bringing up, and do not want to help me because of that, I hope you do still help me, first of all, but remember that it's not just me you'd be helping. This topic already has like 400 or 500 views, so I would think that it matters to other people as well. I will no longer be responding to "Cis vaginas look different as well" assertions, though. I'm not here to debate.
