Well, I only got my hands on mine because my *doctor* requested it and then passed it along; I don't think it's standard procedure to hand them over. My GP was curious, and he wanted to make sure he knew what he was looking at when I came in for a 3-month follow-up. Of course, by that point, he said he would never have been able to guess what the tissues originally were...
(I believe it is standard procedure for most US and Canadian surgeons - generally, not just GRS - to make one. I have no clue whether Thai surgeons routinely do.)
Dena, that report was fascinating, and an excellent example of what we're talking about! And it looks as though, while a clitoris was formed, the majority of the penile nerve bundle and the glans was used as a "cervix" instead, which is vastly different from most current methods. (No offense meant, but I also think the newer methods are an improvement - personally, I'd much rather have all the sensitive nerves located in my clitoris, as is typical with cis women, and forgo having a pseudo-cervix ["pseudo" because there is no uterus, which the cervix actually is part of in cis women].) I almost wonder if that was an example of men imagining how the female genitals should work. 😉 Cis women do not have the majority of their sexual sensation inside the vagina, after all.