Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Should biological origin of transsexualism even matter in an ethical argument?

Started by Attis, November 22, 2007, 10:11:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Quote from: maragirlygirr on November 25, 2007, 09:02:29 AM
Let me begin by saying I am one of these people, however, I have realised that there may not be a such thing as a intermidiate case of GID, I believe that a better term would be:

M2F Androgyne or F2M Androgyne (substitute Genderqueer where it applies)

Everyone has the right to self identify how they choose. At various points I've identified as m2f non op, androgyne, neither, none of the above... my understanding of who I am continues to grow, as does my understanding of what these definitions encompass.

Glad you're here Mara, and I wish you the best as you figure out who you are. No offense taken  :)

zythyra
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Keira


Intermediate cases states of GID would explain a lot
about the current state of gender variances.
People straight in the middle would feel neither
male or female or a mix of both,
a rather strange place to be in current society.

There's also the whole question of somatype aversion
VS needing social integration at various level, which
cannot be easily explained by a binary view of gender
expression. If gender expression is multi-factorial and
thus can exist in subtle variations, then in opens
up the existence of a lot of variety.

Some have a need for a congruent body without social
integration. They are ops, but still living as male!!!
This is one of the strangest for me to understand, yet
they do exist and how can they be explained within
the original TS framework. They can't!

A Complex GID continuum seems to
represent reality better than the original gender theories
that emerged not so long ago. Considering that
this subject is far from being studied extensively by
top notch researchers (often its studied by fringe hacks!!);
there's plenty to be learned about it.

In science, theories need to fit reality or they are
discarded. The initial theories came in the time were
a lot of gender variance was hidden from researchers
and thus not expressed in the theories of the time.
New theories will have to fit reality better.



  •  

Jordan

Keira,

You are very knowlegdeable, in fact I think that I have learned more from you in the last paragraph than anyone else on susans and I really hope it is studied by top notch researchers.

(maybe yourself?)

thank you for your non biased insightful views.

also yes i thought that GID is a continuim not just so black or white like traditionally viewed, and i feel further research into the subject could open a world of gender variances.

And yes I do feel this is a strange place to be in society. LOL

No offense taken BTW that why I came here.

  •