Quote from: Stephanie G on February 02, 2017, 01:17:20 PMThank you for this, it is exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for
. I know I still have work to do but is this more what you mean? http://vocaroo.com/i/s0XjYCpbN4uu Just more natural varitations?
Yes, more like that, though that's not quite what I mean.
In general -- not always, for there are certainly exceptions -- men tend to use volume for emphasis, while women tend to use pitch (volume is instead used to convey emotion). So, until you get used to it, think about which words in a sentence are the most important, and express those words with higher pitches than your baseline. Leading words at the beginning of a phrase, on the other hand, tend to get lower pitches, and everything else falls more or less in between.
So, for example, using the first sentence of the Rainbow Passage, this is how I would say it (exaggerated, perhaps, for effect). I'm using rainbow colors to depict changes in pitch -- yellow is baseline, green is low, orange is high, and red is peak pitch.
QuoteWhen the sunlight strikes raindrops in the air, they act like a prism and form a rainbow.
The greatest words of emphasis for me are "prism" and "rainbow" because they are the most striking concepts to get across, so they get peak pitches in their primary syllables. When possible, I try to use "rising action" for effect, like in the "in the air" where each syllable gets a higher pitch. Of course it's possible to emphasize different words, depending on how you want to get the concepts across so as to indicate what you think is most important in the sentence, or what you think is most important for your listener to get out of the sentence.
It takes practice doing this, because in normal conversation we can't think about pitch and talk at the same time, at least not effectively. But eventually, as with all practice, it starts to sink in and happen automatically.
QuoteOne other question since you will probably know what I mean, you are talking about an octave of range in a speaking voice. Though my range without going into falsetto or singing is like from about 400hz down to 150hz ish without breaking timbre. So how would I figure out a mean frequency to use that best fits me?
I still think 220hz makes a lot of sense for "base" frequency, unless you're a really small woman. 220hz is average for the female population as a whole (at least among English speakers) and average is going to actually be ideal in terms of how other people process your voice.
But do try to hit those notes above 330hz in normal conversation. In this last passage your peak was up to 300hz -- push it just a bit more!
Also, and maybe this is the crappy microphone or just reading aloud, but I struggled to pick up your enunciation in that last passage. Women tend to speak with much more precise enunciation than men -- think "sharper" in terms of the clarity with which words are spoken. And when reading aloud from a passage, it helps to go just a bit slower.
Actually, I think it's better to not read aloud. Just talk -- even if it's to describe what techniques you're trying to focus on for a particular segment.
Quote"I'm working on my musicality right now, and I'm, like, really not sure if this is how I want to come across or not? But that's why I'm recording this, so I can play it back and listen and find out what I'm doing right and what I need to work on. Voice training is such a pain in the butt, and OMG did I really just hit that note?!? I can't even--"
Speaking off-the-cuff, rather than reading aloud, provides more insight into how our natural voices are actually coming across. A lot of people struggle to sound like they normally do when reading from a passage -- you might recall from grade school how kids reading aloud sounded like automatons, just trying to get through an onerous task. Unless you're a good storyteller in general, I think speaking extemporaneously is of greater benefit when it comes to voice training and analyzing your results.