Quote from: kelly_aus on December 07, 2017, 06:37:52 PM
And I get told off for suggesting it - because no medical professional would ever do that, it's not in WPATH's rules!
Rant over, yes, Lexi, this is the case and there is a growing amount of research that suggests there is no need for long term use of antiandrogens.
Yes, I'm taking a little heat on another post for suggesting it as well.
I think some people forget that the old protocols that have been written for MTF transition might not always be the best path for transition.
Also, these same old protocols rely on the assumption all transgender women will complete a full physical transition (SRS).
Therefore they don't address the long term effects of continued anti-androgen use, nor do they investigate proper hormonal therapy involved with keeping the male genitalia intact.
Personally, I waffle between remaining pre-op, non-op or post-op.
The thought of any surgery scares the Hell out of me. But 2 years ago, I never imagined I'd be where I am right now and I don't rule out the idea that 2 years from now I might be ready to get rid of all of my male equipment.
I just look at this way... If I'm going to start cutting pieces away, I want it all gone... "going all in" as it were.
I think most of the push back is from the "old guard". The transwomen that transitioned quite a while ago and weren't presented with other options or other schools of thought. Just look at the first ones to shoot certain ideas down. I've also seen a lot of complaints on other sites about that very thing happening here.
Personally, I see this site as a wonderful resource that many newer Transwoman go to first to get information.
That's why I want the other Transwoman that come here to realize they have other options and not necessarily believe what most of the old literature has to say about MTF transition. (i.e... T blockers until surgery)
Transgender medicine is still an emerging medical field and no one has perfected it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk