Sometimes I read the news and think, "Wait. What?"
For example, we have this story:
Russia introduces 'ideological' visa for homophobic Westernershttps://76crimes.com/2025/04/23/russia-ideological-visa-homophobic/I'll let you read the story for yourself, but:
Russia has long made homophobia and opposition to LGBT+ rights a soft-power tool, and its latest step in this direction is presidential Decree No. 702, signed on August 19, 2024, instituting an "ideological" visa for foreign citizens who share supposed "traditional Russian spiritual and moral values" but live in LGBTQ-friendly countries. The new policy aims to promote the country as a refuge for homophobes and transphobes in Western countries with more liberal attitudes toward LGBT people. ... The move comes after the Russian government has placed the so-called 'international LGBT movement' on its list of terrorists and extremist organizations.
Between September and December 2024, about 200 people, mainly from the United States, France, Canada, Italy and Germany, have reportedly moved to Russia under this program.My concern is, what if all homophobes/transphobes were to leave and go to Russia? That would leave countries mostly inhabited by LGBTQ people and their allies. Would that make those countries "terrorists and extremist organizations" subject to attack? Not likely to happen. The most conservative people I know don't trust the Russian government.
Then we have:
Trump administration looking at $5,000 'baby bonus' to incentivize public to have more childrenhttps://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-administration-5000-baby-bonus-incentivize-public-children/story?id=121094707The White House has been fielding proposals aimed at persuading people to marry and have children, an effort being pushed by outside groups focused on increasing the nation's birth rate after years of decline.We know that his intention is for more women to stay home and stay pregnant. But if this is such an important issue, would he then be open to polygamy?
I think the reason for the decline in birth rate has nothing to do with LGBTQ and is more about women needing to go to work so they can afford things like eggs and daycare for the 1.5 children they have now. Will the White House then increase WIC benefits to help pay to raise more children? Elon Musk can afford it, but many single moms cannot. What about the proposals to cut Medicaid funding? Who is going to pay to raise these kids? Has any thought gone into this at all?
I am just over here shaking my head.