Quote from: Asche on March 04, 2025, 07:38:19 AMAnyway, it is in the 30-day comment period, so comment away!
16 days remain in the comment period. I submitted as Anonymous because I choose not to make my contact information a matter of public record.
My comment:
Before any changes to government policy are made based upon the opinions of the Executive, perhaps it would be best to wait until the courts have determined whether or not the Executive Order is even legal. The fact that it is discriminatory in language and form makes it unconstitutional, which is to be determined by the Judicial Branch.
"A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual's rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary."
~ Marbury v. Madison, (1803)
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them". ~ Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
"An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed". ~ Norton v. Shelby County, Tennessee (1886)