Quote from: Annaliese on May 28, 2025, 03:58:55 PMwouldn't a medical be better in this situation? Depending on time on active duty this may entitle svcmr to some disability benefits and pay. This also requires a med board.
It does not indicate that the involuntary separation is due to medical reasons. I looked into the medical pension option before I decided. It was paltry, so I got the Honorable and photocopied all of my medical records, then took them to the VA and filed my claims.
"Unfit for active duty" can mean many things, from mental illness to criminal activity. I processed out quite a few servicemembers who were alcoholics and drug users who refused rehab. Some were just belligerent troublemakers, so they had numerous assault and disorderly conduct charges in their records.
The official discharge document (DD-214) will have some type of explanation listed, but it is usually encoded so that mostly just military personnel can translate it. It might just show a reenlistment eligibility code like "3C - Not Eligible" or something. Or it may just say "in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-13," which really tells you nothing unless you look it up.
Why it matters is there is a difference between Chapter 5-13 and Chapter 5-17 discharges.
"Chapter 5-13 (Personality Disorder). If a physician trained in psychiatry or a licensed clinical psychologist notifies the commander that the Soldier has a deeply ingrained personality disorder and this disorder is so severe that the Soldier's ability to function effectively in the military
environment is significantly impaired, then the commander may initiate a Chapter 5-13 separation action."
"Chapter 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions). This Chapter is very similar to Chapter 5-13, except that it covers conditions that fail to rise to what the doctors call a "disorder." These are conditions such as chronic airsickness or seasickness, dyslexia, sleepwalking, claustrophobia or "other disorders manifesting disturbances or perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier's ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired." The key factor is that the condition must significantly impair a Soldier's ability to perform his/her assigned military tasks."
My question is, how will they characterize these veterans? Will they call gender dysphoria a "personality disorder" or a "mental condition"? Or will they amend the regulation to add a new chapter that implies a sexual perversion or deviation? It is too soon for me to access the published regulations, but I will as soon as they become available.