Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

SCOTUS rules parents have a right to prevent their kids from reading books...

Started by Jessica_Rose, Today at 05:11:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jessica_Rose

SCOTUS rules parents have a right to prevent their kids from reading books with LGBTQ+ characters

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/06/scotus-rules-parents-have-a-right-to-prevent-their-kids-from-reading-books-with-lgbtq-characters/

Alex Bollinger (27 June 2025)

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Mahmoud v. Taylor, the case brought by parents who said that their First Amendment rights were violated when schools used books that included LGBTQ+ characters.

"The Court does not accept the Board's characterizations of the LGBTQ+-inclusive instruction as mere 'exposure to objectionable ideas' or as lessons in 'mutual respect,'" Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. "The storybooks unmistakably convey a particular viewpoint about same-sex marriage and gender."

"Regardless, the question in cases of this kind is whether the educational requirement or curriculum at issue would 'substantially interfere with the religious development' of the child or pose 'a very real threat of undermining' the religious beliefs and practices the parent wishes to instill in the child."

"Casting aside longstanding precedent, the Court invents a constitutional right to avoid exposure to 'subtle' themes 'contrary to the religious principles' that parents wish to instill in their children," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting opinion. "Exposing students to the 'message' that LGBTQ people exist, and that their loved ones may celebrate their marriages and life events, the majority says, is enough to trigger the most demanding form of judicial scrutiny."

The case involved several sets of Christian and Muslim parents who objected to their kids reading books that mentioned LGBTQ+ people. The district had an opt-out policy that they later rescinded because, the district claimed, the opt-outs were becoming "unworkable."


==========================================================================================

Based on my personal interpretation, this appears to indicate that agnostic and atheist parents have a right for their children not to be exposed to religious themes or characters. Do they understand the door they have opened? Say goodbye to Christmas, Easter, Hanukkah, and every other religious observation in schools.

Love always -- Jessica Rose
Journal thread - Jessica's Rose Garden
National Coming Out Day video - Coming Out
GCS - GCS and BA w/Dr. Ley
GCS II - GCS II and FFS w/Dr. Ley
FFS II - Jaw and chin surgery w/Dr. Ley
Hair - Hair Restoration
23Mar2017 - HRT / 16Feb2018 - Full Time! / 21Feb2019 - GCS / 26July2019 - GCS II / 13Oct2020 - FFS II
"It is never too late to be what you might have been." - George Eliot
  • skype:Jessica_Rose?call
  •